Come back for updates. This is Part 22 of my theoretical geometricc linear regression modeling from 3.22.18, "Bitcoin to C". The modeling sequence starts at Model A, and runs thru Model N. Model N will be newest Model. Each model is strictly built off of the preceding model's geometricc regression points. The regression points from each model, creates a geometricc pattern of indicators in various forms, that can be read to PREDICT future trend movement, before traditional indicators appear. The idea here is to convince you, that what i am doing is not arbitrary but unique and useful. I know the immediate inclination is to doubt what I am doing. That is expected.. and understandable.. But human nature is unpredictable. And you never know when you can learn new things and be completely shocked at someones EXTREMELY insane ideas.. I like going against the norm..
Understand the application of my modeling technique is not traditional by any means. It is theoretical in nature, and 100% experimentally designed and applied by me as we continue this insane experiment day after day.. It was not built for financial analysis, at all. I have literally 0 background in trading, TA's or anything to do with accounting or the stock market. It is being applied, through intuitive and creative means for fun so I could keep up with Bitcoin and Ethereum personally, and invest for myself.. I promise I will make many mistakes making these non-traditional TA's, or even incorrectly use traditional tools and indicators. That is the fun of it, to learn from scratch and apply another idea to a realm unknown to you. This realm is an unknown to me. A knowledge acquisition process. One i am quite enjoying..
Oh how far we have come.. But i fear we have reached the end of the modeling sequence... In my eyes we have two options; Model Sequence Failure or we reach Bitcoin to C's goal of 9100-9400 by April 19th.
I have detected the end of a an operator.. All indicators clearly show evidence of a model sequence failure IFFF we do not REACH 'Bitcoin to C' but instead cross this operator intersect.. Crossing this operator intersect is not an option. If we cross it I will declare sequence failure and this will end, 'Bitcoin to C sequence'. At which point I have the choice to start from scratch, or find a connect from the last previous working Model. If i can not find a connect to a previous working model. I will have to start from scratch once again.
I know this is confusing. It is kind of designed to be because I am creating it as we go. This is a MASSIVE learning curve for me, using my modeling technique here. My modeling technique was not designed for crypto. So it is a learning process.. Understand that.
Model N will be rendering soon. I have added a new tool: Gann Fan.
The Gann fan works very well with what i am doing believe it or not. I just discovered it yesterday. I have learning so much over the past month. Thank you to all who continue to inquiry about this and ask questions. I love it.
As always, thanks for looking! Glitch420
Bình luận
⋅
Oh boy..
Bình luận
⋅
next few cycles for sure..
Bình luận
⋅
dun dun . dun dun..
Bình luận
⋅
Not even going to say anything... :)
Bình luận
⋅
This is a lot of fun.. Designing shit from scratch is pretty rewarding honestly..
Bình luận
⋅
And behind door number 3........
Bình luận
⋅
Ultra nervous.. This point is the end of Model M.. We have to re-enter Model M in order for Outlier to be an outlier..
Bình luận
⋅
If we pass Model M, without re-entry.. Model M will have failed. Period.
Bình luận
⋅
We have entered the channel.. WE MUST BLAST. DO OR FUCKING DIE.
Bình luận
⋅
Synchronization complete...
Bình luận
⋅
no words just watch, will explain later.
Bình luận
⋅
last shot.. 0_o. I made an error in my choice in oscillation and I realized that after..
Bình luận
⋅
Do or die... I know i said this before.. but this is a learning process.
Bình luận
⋅
Model N rendered! New IDEA SOON! I will explain why we did not fail by not re-entering Model M; which i said was a must. I was wrong.
THIS IS IT!! BITCOIN TO C OR DIE.
Bình luận
⋅
Market manipulation is legit. crazy manipulation over the past couple days. But the model made space for it.. It is insane. Last post for here.
Awesome work - I hope you share your next model! Such a unique concept - have enjoyed following along
tommyf1001
⋅
Nice work, look forward to more of these charts! It's very interesting and I've honestly never seen anything like it, so props to you for being different and setting yourself apart from the others
Glitch420
⋅
@tommyf1001, that means so much to me.. All i wanted was to be different, to find a road not traveled by others.. Thank you for seeing that. It will only get better from here.. Up is the only way forward..
tommyf1001
⋅
@Glitch420, That's awesome! So if we don't enter model M, this model will fail right? And you'll have to design a new one from scratch? I'm just trying to get a better understanding of all of this
BigRest
⋅
I love this conceptually and wish you good fortune working it all out. I'm personally completely confused by it, as it's my first time seeing any of this, but I intend to go back and review your previous ideas to see if I can get a more complete understanding.
Glitch420
⋅
@BigRest, thank you as well for your kid words. If you have questions I can do my best to answer them! Have a good one.