LSMA - A Fast And Simple Alternative Calculation


At the start of 2019 i published my first post "Approximating A Least Square Moving Average In Pine", who aimed to provide alternatives calculation of the least squares moving average ( LSMA ), a moving average who aim to estimate the underlying trend in the price without excessive lag.

The LSMA has the form of a linear regression ax + b where x is a linear sequence 1.2.3..N and with time varying a and b, the exact formula of the LSMA is as follows :

a = stdev(close,length)/stdev(bar_index,length) * correlation(close,bar_index,length)
b = sma (close,length) - a*sma(bar_index,length)
lsma = a*bar_index + b

Such calculation allow to forecast future values however such forecast is rarely accurate and the LSMA is mostly used as a smoother. In this post an alternative calculation is proposed, such calculation is incredibly simple and allow for an extremely efficient computation of the LSMA .


The LSMA is a FIR low-pass filter with the following impulse response :

The impulse response of a FIR filter gives us the weight of the filter, as we can see the weights of the LSMA are a linearly decreasing sequence of values, however unlike the linearly weighted moving average ( WMA ) the weights of the LSMA take on negative values, this is necessary in order to provide a better fit to the data. Based on such impulse response we know that the WMA can help calculate the LSMA , since both have weights representing a linearly decreasing sequence of values, however the WMA doesn't have negative weights, so the process here is to fit the WMA impulse response to the impulse response of the LSMA .

Based on such negative values we know that we must subtract the impulse response of the WMA by a constant value and multiply the result, such constant value can be given by the impulse response of a simple moving average , we must now make sure that the impulse response of the WMA and SMA cross at a precise point, the point where the impulse response of the LSMA is equal to 0.

We can see that 3WMA and 2SMA are equal at a certain point, and that the impulse response of the LSMA is equal to 0 at that point, if we proceed to subtraction we obtain :

Therefore :

LSMA = 3WMA - 2SMA = WMA + 2( WMA - SMA )


On a graph the difference isn't visible, subtracting the proposed calculation with a regular LSMA of the same period gives :

the error is 0.0000000...and certainly go on even further, therefore we can assume that the error is due to rounding errors.


This post provided a different calculation of the LSMA , it is shown that the LSMA can be made from the linear combination of a WMA and a SMA : 3WMA + -2SMA. I encourage peoples to use impulse responses in order to estimate other moving averages, since some are extremely heavy to compute.

Thanks for reading !


Become a Patreon and get access to exclusive technical indicators!

You can also check out some of the indicators I made for luxalgo :
Mã nguồn mở

Với tinh thần TradingView, tác giả của tập lệnh này đã xuất bản nó dưới dạng mã nguồn mở, vì vậy các nhà giao dịch có thể hiểu và xác minh nó. Chúc mừng tác giả! Bạn có thể sử dụng mã này miễn phí, nhưng việc sử dụng lại mã này trong một ấn phẩm chịu sự điều chỉnh của Nội quy nội bộ. Bạn có thể yêu thích nó để sử dụng nó trên biểu đồ.

Thông báo miễn trừ trách nhiệm

Thông tin và ấn phẩm không có nghĩa là và không cấu thành, tài chính, đầu tư, kinh doanh, hoặc các loại lời khuyên hoặc khuyến nghị khác được cung cấp hoặc xác nhận bởi TradingView. Đọc thêm trong Điều khoản sử dụng.

Bạn muốn sử dụng tập lệnh này trên biểu đồ?