Bắt đầu

Setup-quality

Trendline Retest Planner [AGPro Series]Trendline Retest Planner 🧠 Core Idea Is the active trendline retest constructive enough to keep the setup under review, or is it starting to fail? 📌 Overview / What it does Trendline Retest Planner is a chart-first decision tool for traders who review price behavior around active support and resistance trendline retests. Instead of drawing many trendlines or flagging every break, the script focuses on one active trendline retest context at a time. It measures line age, touch count, retest depth, close response, and volume support, then converts that evidence into a 0-100 Retest Score and a clear next-action state. The script produces an active trendline, retest pocket, hold/fail labels, invalidation edge, target path, alerts, and a compact AGPro planning panel. It does not predict price movement, automate execution, or provide guaranteed outcomes. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built to fill the gap between auto-trendline drawing and practical retest planning. Many tools can draw diagonals or detect a break. The harder question is what to do after price returns to the line: is the retest holding, weakening, failing, or still waiting for confirmation? Trendline Retest Planner supports a decision workflow: identify the active retest, read the score, locate the invalidation edge, compare the target path, and decide what deserves review next. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most trendline tools focus on drawing many lines, ranking confluence, or detecting trendline breaks. This script does NOT clone Auto Trendline Break Quality, Auto Trendlines MTF - Break/Retest, Trendline Confluence Map, Break-Retest Quality, Structure Retest Planner, Swing Retest Quality, or a generic support/resistance zone map. Instead, it narrows the workflow to one active support or resistance trendline retest and evaluates whether that retest is constructive or failing. The main output is not a buy or sell signal. It is a decision state: READY, MONITOR, FAILING, INVALIDATED, WATCH, WAIT, or SCAN. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script builds the latest support and resistance trendline candidates from confirmed swing pivots, then selects the nearest valid retest context. 2. Reference Mapping It maps the active trendline, a retest pocket around the line, an invalidation edge, and a forward target path. 3. Reaction Evaluation The 0-100 model scores line age, touch count, retest depth, close response, and volume support. 4. Visual Output The chart shows the active planning objects, compact state labels, and a clean AGPro decision panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Trendline = the active support or resistance line being evaluated. Retest Pocket = the ATR-based area around the trendline where a retest is considered active. Invalidation Edge = the planning reference where the active retest context is considered broken. Target Path = a forward guide based on the trendline-to-risk distance. Labels = compact TEST, READY, MONITOR, WEAK, INVALID, PATH, and sparse context labels. Colors = teal marks support-side retest context, pink marks resistance-side retest context, amber marks caution, indigo marks monitoring/follow-through, and red marks invalidation. Panel = the AGPro panel summarizes Trendline Side, Retest Score, Hold State, Risk Edge, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • READY → the retest is active, holding on the correct side, and the score is strong enough for structured review. • MONITOR → the retest is developing, but confirmation or score quality is still incomplete. • FAILING → price touched the pocket, but the response is weak or on the wrong side. • INVALIDATED → price crossed the invalidation edge and the active context should be rebuilt. • WATCH → price is approaching the trendline pocket. • WAIT → a valid trendline exists, but price is not close enough for useful retest review. • SCAN → no valid trendline context is active yet. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when price touches the active retest pocket, when READY state appears, when MONITOR state appears, when a failing retest is detected, when the invalidation edge is crossed, and when follow-through appears after an active retest. Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions, automated strategy commands, or outcome promises. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest context appears when the active line is fresh enough, has enough touches, retests with controlled depth, closes back on the correct side, and receives supportive relative volume. When these components conflict, the panel moves toward MONITOR, FAILING, WATCH, WAIT, or INVALIDATED. 📊 When to Use • Trendline support retests during constructive pullbacks • Trendline resistance retests during bearish continuation attempts • Price-action review after a diagonal support or resistance line is already visible • Retest planning where invalidation and target path matter • Liquid markets where pivots, candles, and volume behavior are readable ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Very low-liquidity symbols with irregular candles • Extremely noisy micro-timeframes • News-driven spikes where trendline geometry becomes distorted • Markets where swing pivots are too compressed to form useful lines • Situations where the user expects a signal-only or auto-trading tool 🎛️ Key Inputs • Trendline Side → selects Auto, Support Retest, or Resistance Retest. • Trendline Pivot Length → controls how confirmed swing anchors are detected. • Max Trendline Age → controls how old a trendline can be before it is ignored. • Touch Count Lookback → controls how extra line touches are counted. • Sensitivity → adjusts retest pocket width and activation distance. • READY Score → sets the score threshold for stronger review states. • Label and Panel Font Size → controls chart-label and panel readability. • Panel Location and Theme → adjusts the AGPro panel layout. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is designed to stay chart-first and decision-led. The active trendline is the main reference. The retest pocket is drawn around that line with centered text so the chart stays readable. The invalidation edge and target path explain where the planning context weakens and what forward room is being mapped. The AGPro panel uses a merged blue title row and five compact rows so the user can read side, score, hold state, risk edge, and action quickly. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state and Retest Score. 2. Check whether price is approaching or touching the retest pocket. 3. Compare current price with the invalidation edge. 4. Review whether the label says TEST, READY, MONITOR, WEAK, INVALID, or PATH. 5. Confirm the broader market context before making any decision. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think in terms of retest quality, not prediction. A higher score means multiple retest components align inside the script's rule set. A weaker score means the line may be too old, the retest may be too shallow, too deep, missing a constructive close, or lacking participation. The script helps organize the review process. It does not replace judgment. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not an auto-trading system • Not a guaranteed signal tool • Not a broad auto-trendline map • Not a trendline confluence scanner • Not a break-and-retest scanner • Not a generic support/resistance zone map • Not an order block, FVG, or supply/demand tool ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency • Pivot-based trendlines appear only after pivots are confirmed. • Scores can vary across symbols, sessions, and timeframes. • Volume scoring depends on exchange-provided volume data. • Fast volatility can cross a trendline before a clean retest can be measured. • In Live Updating mode, active-bar values can change before the bar closes. 🧠 Market Context Notes Trendline retests are easiest to interpret when liquidity, volatility, and swing structure are readable. A trendline touch is not enough by itself. Line quality, response, invalidation distance, and target path all matter. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price returns to an upward support trendline and closes back above the pocket with a high score, the panel may move toward READY. When price touches a downward resistance trendline but cannot close back below it, the planner may move toward FAILING or INVALIDATED. When price is near the line but has not touched the pocket yet, the panel can stay in WATCH or WAIT. 🧱 System Philosophy Trendline Retest Planner follows the AGPro decision-engine approach: identify context, score quality, map risk, show the next action, and keep the chart readable. It is designed to help traders evaluate a specific planning question instead of adding another generic signal layer. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No score, label, alert, or chart object guarantees any market outcome. The script organizes retest context and highlights conditions for review. It does not provide certainty. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users remain responsible for their own decisions, position sizing, execution, and risk management. This script is for educational and analytical purposes only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use the planner as a structured reading layer: trendline context first, retest quality second, invalidation and target path third, broader market context always.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
2
Target Path Quality [AGPro Series]Target Path Quality 🧠 Core Idea Is the path toward the next practical target reference clean, blocked, or too risky to review? 📌 Overview / What it does Target Path Quality is a chart-first target path planning tool built to evaluate the route between current price and a practical target reference. Instead of drawing a target and implying certainty, the script studies the path itself. It maps a forward path corridor, recent structure blockers, target room, invalidation context, a 0-100 Path Quality score, state labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro decision panel. It does not predict that a target will be reached, automate execution, print buy/sell commands, or replace broader market context. Its purpose is to help traders judge whether the route toward a target is clean enough to deserve attention. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who already have a directional idea but need a cleaner way to evaluate the target path before focusing on execution. Many tools draw target levels, projection zones, or take-profit ladders. Those visuals can be useful, but they often skip the more important question: what is between current price and the target? Target Path Quality fills that gap by converting path cleanliness, blockers, risk edge, target room, volatility fit, and reaction history into one readable decision workflow. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on where price could go. This script does NOT promise a target hit, build a take-profit ladder, or behave like a projection suite. Instead, it asks whether the route toward the target reference is structurally clean, blocked by recent pivots, too close to justify attention, or too exposed to invalidation risk. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The engine identifies the active path side using EMA context or the user-selected directional mode. 2. Reference Mapping The script maps a practical target reference, an invalidation review rail, and a forward path corridor. 3. Reaction Evaluation It evaluates structure blockers, target-room distance, risk edge, trend support, volatility fit, and recent directional reaction history. 4. Visual Output The result is shown through a centered path corridor label, blocker markers, target/invalidation rails, compact event labels, deterministic alerts, and a premium AGPro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Path Corridor = the active review route between current price and the practical target reference. Its label is centered inside the corridor. Blocker Markers = recent confirmed pivots sitting inside the path. These represent possible structural obstacles. Target Rail = the practical target reference used for path-quality review. It is not a guaranteed destination. Invalidation Rail = the risk edge behind the active path. It is an analytical reference, not a stop recommendation. Labels = compact state markers such as PATH READY, WATCH PATH, BLOCKED PATH, TARGET REVIEW, or INVALID REVIEW. Colors = teal supports cleaner long-side path quality, pink supports short-side or risk context, amber marks blocker/review states, and indigo marks target-reference context. Panel = summarizes Path Quality, Blockers, Target Room, Risk Edge, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • PATH READY → the path quality score is strong, target room is acceptable, and blockers are limited. • WATCH PATH → the route is improving but does not meet the strongest review conditions. • BLOCKED PATH → one or more structure blockers reduce route cleanliness. • TARGET REVIEW → price has reached the active target reference area and context should be reviewed. • INVALID REVIEW → price crossed the active invalidation rail and the path should be reassessed. • WAIT → the current route does not provide enough path quality for active review. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts can trigger when the path becomes ready, enters watch mode, becomes blocked, reaches the target reference review area, or crosses the invalidation review rail. Each alert is an attention marker. Alerts are not trade instructions, entry commands, exit commands, or automated strategy rules. 🧩 Confluence Logic Path quality improves when target room is practical, blockers are limited, EMA context supports the active side, volatility is neither too quiet nor overheated, and recent candles show directional reaction history. When these elements align, the route becomes cleaner. When blockers or invalidation risk rise, the route becomes weaker. 📊 When to Use • When reviewing a directional setup that already has a target idea • During breakout continuation review • During pullback continuation planning • When comparing whether target room is clean or structurally blocked • When a trader wants target context without a promise-based target tool ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Extremely low-liquidity symbols • Very noisy ranges where pivots form too frequently • News-driven volatility spikes • Markets where target references are too close to current price • Situations where broader context contradicts the active path 🎛️ Key Inputs • Path Side → controls whether the script evaluates Auto, Long Path, or Short Path context. • Sensitivity → changes pivot strictness and blocker selectivity. • Target Path Lookback → controls how far back the script searches for target references and blockers. • Minimum / Ideal / Maximum Target Room ATR → controls how target room affects the score. • Max Clean Path Blockers → defines how many blockers are tolerated before the path becomes blocked. • Label and panel settings → control visibility, location, theme, and font sizes. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The panel follows the AGPro public-release standard with one merged blue header row containing only the panel title. The chart is designed to stay active without becoming crowded. It uses one main path corridor, up to three blocker markers, target and invalidation rails, and controlled state labels. Label and panel font sizes are adjustable, with Normal as the default. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel Path Quality score. 2. Check whether blockers appear inside the path corridor. 3. Compare target room against the invalidation rail. 4. Review whether the action state says Path review, Track path, Clear blockers, Review target, or Review risk. 5. Confirm the broader market context before making any independent decision. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A clean path does not mean price must reach the target reference. A blocked path does not mean price cannot continue. The script is best read as a route-quality filter. It helps organize whether the path is clean, obstructed, risky, or ready for review. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not an auto trading system • Not guaranteed signals • Not a take-profit ladder • Not a promise that price will reach any target ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency Target path quality can change quickly when volatility expands, pivots update, or price crosses a key reference. Different timeframes may produce different blocker structures and target-room readings. Low-liquidity or high-noise markets can create unstable path evaluations. 🧠 Market Context Notes Target path analysis is strongest when combined with liquidity, structure, volatility, and trend context. A route can look attractive by distance but still become lower quality when recent pivots block the path or the invalidation rail is too exposed. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price trends upward and the path to the next swing reference is open, the script may show PATH READY. When a recent pivot high sits between current price and the target reference, the script may show BLOCKED PATH. When price reaches the target reference rail, the script may show TARGET REVIEW. When price crosses the invalidation rail behind the path, the script may show INVALID REVIEW. 🧱 System Philosophy AGPro Series tools are designed to support structured decision review, not emotional signal chasing. Target Path Quality follows that philosophy by focusing on route cleanliness, blocker context, risk edge, and next-action state instead of a simple directional signal. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No target reference is certain. No path score guarantees continuation. No alert should be treated as a trade instruction. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own decisions, position sizing, risk controls, and market interpretation. This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use this tool to study how target path quality changes as blockers appear, target room expands or contracts, and invalidation risk shifts. The strongest value comes from comparing the path corridor, blocker markers, risk rail, and broader market context together.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Trend Re-Entry Planner [AGPro Series]Trend Re-Entry Planner 🧠 Core Idea Is an active trend pullback creating a clean re-entry planning context, or is the reset becoming too risky? 📌 Overview / What it does Trend Re-Entry Planner is a chart-first trend continuation planning tool designed to evaluate pullbacks inside an active trend structure. The default profile is tuned for 1H charts, where re-entry pockets, trigger candles, invalidation edges, and target-room context usually remain more readable. The script builds a re-entry pocket from the current impulse range, scores the quality of the pullback, maps a trend defense line, shows an invalidation edge, and estimates target-room context. The goal is to help users judge whether a pullback is becoming organized enough for review or whether the trend context should be rebuilt. It does not predict price, automate entries, or turn every pullback into a signal. It is a rule-based planning framework for evaluating trend re-entry structure. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who already track trend continuation but want a cleaner way to decide whether a pullback is worth attention. Many trend tools show direction. Many pullback tools mark a reaction. This script focuses on the planning layer between those two ideas: trend side, pullback depth, reset quality, trigger behavior, target room, risk edge, and next action. The design supports a disciplined workflow: evaluate context first, then decide whether the setup is ready, confirmed, invalidated, or still waiting. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on trend direction, moving average crosses, or broad pullback labels. This script does NOT clone SuperTrend pullback grading, generic trend continuation signals, or low-volume pullback zones. Instead, it uses an EMA trend stack and impulse-based re-entry pocket to build a planning view around the current pullback. The output is not just a marker. It is a decision panel with a 0-100 re-entry score, pullback depth, risk edge, target-room context, and next-action state. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script identifies active bullish or bearish trend structure using an EMA stack and directional slope. 2. Reference Mapping It maps the current impulse range and builds a concept-native re-entry pocket from that range. 3. Reaction Evaluation The engine scores trend slope, pullback depth, reset quality near the mid EMA, trigger candle behavior, and target-room availability. 4. Visual Output The script displays the re-entry pocket, invalidation edge, target-room guide, event labels, sparse context labels, and a premium AG Pro planning panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the re-entry pocket and target-room area used for planning context. Labels = READY, CONFIRMED, INVALIDATED, FOLLOW-THROUGH, and sparse context states. Colors = teal for bullish continuation context, pink for bearish or invalidation context, yellow for watch/review states, and indigo for target-room or follow-through emphasis. Panel = the compact decision dashboard showing trend side, re-entry score, pullback depth, risk edge, and action. 🚦 Signals & States • WATCH → the pullback is developing but still needs confirmation or cleaner structure. • READY → the re-entry context has enough quality for closer review. • CONFIRMED → a qualifying trigger candle appears after the pullback context improves. • FOLLOW-THROUGH → the confirmed context produces a stronger continuation marker. • INVALIDATED → price crosses the active invalidation edge and the plan should be rebuilt. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when the script detects READY, CONFIRMED, INVALIDATED, or FOLLOW-THROUGH states. Each alert is an attention marker tied to the rule-based state engine. Alerts are not trade instructions and do not guarantee that continuation will occur. 🧩 Confluence Logic The context becomes stronger when trend slope, pullback depth, mid-EMA reset quality, trigger candle behavior, and target-room availability align. The script intentionally requires multiple conditions instead of labeling every trend pullback as meaningful. 📊 When to Use • 1H charts with active directional structure • Directional markets with clear trend structure • Pullbacks after a visible impulse move • Continuation review workflows • Trend-following plans where risk edge and target room matter ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Low-liquidity symbols with unreliable price movement • Extremely choppy markets with frequent trend-stack flips • News-driven volatility where pullback structure changes too quickly • Markets where the active impulse range is stale or unclear 🎛️ Key Inputs • Sensitivity → adjusts how selective the re-entry score model is. • Planning Profile → keeps the default behavior tuned for hourly re-entry planning or allows manual/higher-timeframe adjustment. • Impulse Lookback → controls the range used to build the re-entry pocket. • Re-Entry Depth settings → define the shallow, ideal, and deep areas of the pocket. • Thresholds → control WATCH, READY, and CONFIRMED state requirements. • Visual settings → control zones, EMA stack, labels, panel theme, panel location, and font sizes. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is built around a clean AG Pro panel and chart-first planning visuals. The re-entry pocket and target-room guide are intentionally restrained so price remains readable. Labels are limited and spaced to keep the chart informative without becoming crowded. The first panel row uses the standard AGPro merged blue header format. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel to identify trend side and current action. 2. Check whether price is interacting with the re-entry pocket. 3. Evaluate the score, pullback depth, and risk edge. 4. Wait for READY or CONFIRMED state before treating the context as review-worthy. 5. Rebuild the plan if the invalidation edge is crossed. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think in terms of planning quality, not certainty. A higher score means the current pullback has more constructive re-entry characteristics according to the script's rule set. A lower score means the pullback is less organized, has poor target room, lacks a clear trigger, or has moved too close to invalidation. Use the script as a structure-reading tool within broader market context. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not an auto-trading system • Not guaranteed signals • Not a SuperTrend pullback clone • Not a generic support/resistance zone map ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency The script is rule-based and depends on visible chart data. Timeframe differences, volatility shifts, low liquidity, and sudden news events can change how re-entry structure appears. The score reflects the internal model only. It does not know future order flow, future liquidity, or future market intent. 🧠 Market Context Notes Trend re-entry quality is usually clearer when a market has directional structure, a readable impulse, and enough room before nearby obstacles. When a trend is mature, overly extended, or choppy, the same pullback behavior may carry less useful information. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price pulls into the re-entry pocket during a bullish EMA stack and then prints a constructive trigger candle, the script may shift from WATCH to READY or CONFIRMED. When price crosses the invalidation edge, the script marks the context as INVALIDATED so the user can rebuild the plan instead of forcing the old structure. 🧱 System Philosophy AGPro planning tools are designed to turn chart structure into a clearer decision workflow. This script follows that philosophy by focusing on context, readiness, risk edge, and next action rather than simple signal output. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No script can guarantee continuation, reversal, profit, or accuracy. This tool provides structured context only. Users should combine it with their own analysis, timeframe review, and risk management process. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own decisions, position sizing, trade management, and risk control. This script does not provide financial advice and does not guarantee trading outcomes. 📚 Educational Note Trend Re-Entry Planner is intended to help users study how pullbacks behave inside active trend structure and how planning context can be organized more clearly.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Retest Defense Planner [AGPro Series]Retest Defense Planner 🧠 Core Idea Is a retested level still being defended strongly enough to keep the planning context alive? 📌 Overview / What it does Retest Defense Planner is a chart-first decision tool built for traders who review how price behaves after returning to an active defense shelf. Instead of treating every level touch as meaningful, the script evaluates whether the shelf is actually being protected. It measures retest depth, wick defense, close response, time at level, volume support, target room, and risk-edge distance, then converts that evidence into a 0-100 Retest Score and a clear next-action state. The default view is tuned for clear 4H-style retest review, where shelf defense, reaction quality, and short-term follow-through are usually easier to read than on very compressed timeframes. The script still works across timeframes, but users should adjust shelf age, projection bars, and sensitivity when changing market rhythm. The script produces a defense zone, active defense rail, risk edge, target-room guide, follow-through guide, compact chart labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro planning panel. It does not predict price movement, automate execution, or provide guaranteed outcomes. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built to fill the gap between simple level plotting and full structure scanners. Many traders can identify that price has returned to a level, but the harder question is whether the level is still being defended cleanly enough to deserve attention. Retest Defense Planner focuses on that decision layer. The design supports a planning mindset: read the defense state, check the score, locate the risk edge, compare target room, and decide what deserves review next. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most retest tools focus on structure breaks, swing-leg pullbacks, support/resistance maps, or broad breakout retest signals. This script does NOT clone Structure Retest Planner, Swing Retest Quality, Breakout Retest Readiness, Break-Retest Quality, Breaker Block Engine, or a generic S/R zone map. Instead, it evaluates one active defense shelf and asks whether the shelf is surviving the retest. The main output is not a signal. It is a decision state: DEFENDED, WATCH, WEAK RETEST, APPROACH, DEFENSE LOST, WAIT, or SCAN. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script identifies fresh support-side or resistance-side defense shelves using confirmed pivot behavior and optional automatic side selection. 2. Reference Mapping It maps one active defense zone, a shelf rail, a risk edge, and a target-room guide. These are planning references, not trade instructions. 3. Reaction Evaluation The 0-100 model scores retest depth, wick defense, close response, time at level, and volume support. 4. Visual Output The chart shows the active defense zone with centered text, event labels, guide lines, and the AGPro decision panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Defense Zone = the active shelf area being evaluated after price returns to it. Defense Rail = the exact reference shelf the model is monitoring. Risk Edge = the planning line where the active defense context is considered lost. Target-Room Guide = a forward context guide based on the current shelf-to-risk distance. Labels = compact TEST, DEFENDED, WATCH, WEAK, LOST, and context labels. Colors = teal marks bullish support-defense context, pink marks bearish resistance-defense context, amber marks caution/review, indigo marks watch/transition, and red marks lost defense. Panel = the AGPro panel summarizes Defense State, Retest Score, Reaction Quality, Risk Edge, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • DEFENDED → the shelf has been retested and the defense score is strong enough for structured review. • WATCH → the response is developing, but confirmation or room is still incomplete. • WEAK RETEST → price touched the shelf, but response quality is not strong enough. • APPROACH → price is near the active defense shelf and a retest review may be forming. • DEFENSE LOST → price crossed the risk edge and the active shelf context should be rebuilt. • WAIT → an active shelf exists, but price is not close enough for a useful review. • SCAN → no fresh defense shelf is active yet. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when price touches the active defense zone, when a defended retest appears, when watch context appears, when a weak retest is detected, and when the risk edge is crossed. Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions, automated strategy commands, or outcome promises. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest context appears when a controlled retest probe, visible wick defense, constructive close response, enough hold time, supportive relative volume, and usable target room align. When those components conflict, the panel moves toward WATCH, WEAK RETEST, RISK REVIEW, or DEFENSE LOST. 📊 When to Use • Pullbacks into a defended support shelf • Retests of a resistance shelf after bearish pressure • 4H retest reviews where shelf defense and reaction candles are visually readable • Continuation planning where the level has already been identified by price action • Risk planning where invalidation and target room matter • Liquid markets where candles, pivots, and volume behavior are readable ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Very low-liquidity symbols with irregular candles • Extremely noisy micro-timeframes • News-driven spikes where shelf behavior becomes distorted • Markets where pivot structure is too compressed to form useful shelves • Situations where the user expects a signal-only tool 🎛️ Key Inputs • Defense Side → selects Auto, Bullish Defense, or Bearish Defense. • Defense Pivot Length → controls how confirmed shelves are detected. • Max Shelf Age → controls how long a shelf remains eligible. • Sensitivity → adjusts activation distance and zone tolerance. • Response Window Bars → controls how long the retest response remains active. • Risk Edge ATR → controls the planning risk edge behind the shelf. • DEFENDED Score → sets the score threshold for stronger review states. • Label and Panel Font Size → controls chart-label and panel readability. • Panel Location and Theme → adjusts the AGPro panel layout. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is designed to stay chart-first and decision-led. The defense zone is the main visual object. The centered label keeps the zone readable without adding extra floating text. The risk edge and target guide explain where the planning context weakens and how much room remains. The AGPro panel uses a merged blue title row and five compact rows so the user can read state, score, reaction quality, risk, and next action quickly. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state and Retest Score. 2. Check whether price is approaching or touching the defense zone. 3. Compare the shelf rail with the risk edge. 4. Review whether the label says TEST, DEFENDED, WATCH, WEAK, or LOST. 5. Confirm the broader market context before making any decision. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think in terms of defense quality, not prediction. A higher score means multiple defense components align inside the script's rule set. A weaker score means the retest may be too shallow, too deep, too fast, too noisy, or missing a constructive close response. The script helps organize the review process. It does not replace judgment. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not an auto-trading system • Not a guaranteed signal tool • Not a BOS / CHOCH scanner • Not a breakout retest scanner • Not a swing-leg retest tool • Not an order block, FVG, or supply/demand map • Not a generic support/resistance zone map ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency • Pivot-based shelf references appear only after pivots are confirmed. • Scores can vary across symbols, sessions, and timeframes. • Volume scoring depends on exchange-provided volume data. • Fast volatility can cross a shelf before a clean defense can be measured. • In Live Updating mode, active-bar values can change before the bar closes. 🧠 Market Context Notes Retest defense is easiest to interpret when liquidity, volatility, and trend context are readable. A defended shelf is not enough by itself. The reaction, close location, hold time, risk edge, and target room all matter. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price returns to a support shelf, probes the defense zone, forms a visible lower wick, and closes back above the shelf with enough target room, the planner may mark DEFENDED. When price touches the shelf but closes weakly with poor reaction quality, the planner may show WEAK RETEST or WATCH. When price crosses the risk edge, DEFENSE LOST indicates that the active context should be rebuilt. 🧱 System Philosophy Retest Defense Planner follows the AGPro decision-engine approach: map the context, score the quality, show the risk reference, show the target room, and summarize the next action without issuing trade commands. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No indicator can provide certainty. The script does not guarantee that a retest will hold, continue, reverse, or produce any specific outcome. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and trading decisions. This script is provided for educational and analytical purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use the script as a structured retest-defense review framework. The best results come from combining the panel, zones, labels, and alerts with broader chart context and disciplined risk evaluation.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Range Rejection Planner [AGPro Series]Range Rejection Planner 🧠 Core Idea Is price rejecting a range edge with enough quality to monitor back toward the midline? 📌 Overview / What it does Range Rejection Planner is a chart-first range reaction decision engine built to evaluate whether price is rejecting the active range edge with enough structure to deserve attention. The script maps one relevant range edge, a focused edge-reaction zone, wick rejection behavior, close-back-inside quality, midline room, invalidation shelf, failure risk, event labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro planning panel. These components are converted into a 0-100 Rejection Score and a clear next-action state. It does not predict price movement, automate trades, draw a full support/resistance library, or guarantee that a range edge will hold. Its purpose is to organize the range-edge rejection review process with practical risk and midline context. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who want to evaluate range-edge reactions without turning the chart into a crowded level map. Many range tools show boundaries, fills, or breakout markers, but they often stop before answering the practical planning question: did price actually reject the edge, is there room back to the midline, and where does the idea fail? The design philosophy is simple: a range-edge rejection is only useful when the edge interaction, wick response, close-back-inside behavior, midline room, and failure shelf can be read together. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on drawing support/resistance zones, marking every range touch, or highlighting breakouts. This script does NOT clone Support Resistance Reaction Map, does not build a multi-level S/R inventory, and does not act as a broad breakout or break-retest scanner. Instead, it focuses on one active range and one active edge. The main output is not a buy/sell signal. It is a planning state that helps users decide whether the edge rejection deserves review, whether midline room exists, and whether failure risk is rising. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script builds an active range from previous bars and identifies whether price is interacting with the upper or lower edge. 2. Reference Mapping It maps the relevant edge zone, the range midline, and an invalidation shelf beyond the rejected edge. 3. Reaction Evaluation The model scores edge proximity, wick rejection, close-back-inside quality, relative volume response, midline room, and active range quality. 4. Visual Output The result appears as a centered range-edge zone, a midline review path, guide lines, compact state labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the active range-edge zone shows the relevant upper or lower boundary being evaluated. The zone label is centered inside the shape. Midline Path = the projected review area between the rejected edge and the range midline. It helps show whether there is enough room for interpretation. Labels = compact markers show EDGE WATCH, REJECT READY, MIDLINE REVIEW, MIDLINE HIT, or FAILURE RISK context. Colors = teal supports lower-edge rejection context, pink supports upper-edge rejection context, amber highlights review states, and indigo marks midline references. Panel = the panel summarizes Range Edge, Rejection Score, Midline Room, Failure Risk, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • EDGE WATCH → price is probing a range edge and early rejection conditions are developing. • REJECT READY → range-edge rejection quality reached the selected score threshold. • MIDLINE REVIEW → an active rejection context is being monitored toward the range midline. • MIDLINE HIT → price reached the active range midline after a rejection context. • FAILURE RISK → price crossed the invalidation shelf beyond the rejected edge. • RANGE WAIT → a range exists, but the edge interaction is not strong enough yet. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when the planner enters EDGE WATCH, REJECT READY, MIDLINE REVIEW, MIDLINE HIT, or FAILURE RISK. Each alert is an attention marker. Alerts are not trade instructions, entry commands, exit commands, or automated strategy rules. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest context appears when several conditions align: Range edge probe + strong rejection wick + close back inside the range + supportive relative volume + meaningful room back to the midline + a clear invalidation shelf. When these components weaken, the planner can stay in EDGE WATCH, return to RANGE WAIT, or shift into FAILURE RISK. 📊 When to Use • During range-bound markets where edge reactions matter • When price probes the upper or lower boundary of a recent range • When evaluating whether an edge rejection has enough midline room • When a trader wants risk and invalidation context around a range reaction • On liquid symbols where wicks, volume, and range boundaries are readable ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Extremely low-liquidity symbols with unreliable wicks or volume • Very noisy micro-timeframes where range edges shift too often • News-driven volatility spikes that distort normal range behavior • Strong trend expansion where range rejection is no longer the main context • Situations where the user expects automatic buy/sell signals 🎛️ Key Inputs • Range Edge Mode → chooses Auto, Upper Edge Rejection, or Lower Edge Rejection. • Active Range Lookback → controls the previous-bar range used for edge evaluation. • Range Edge Zone ATR → controls the width of the focused edge-reaction zone. • Close-Back-Inside ATR → defines how much price should close back inside after probing an edge. • Invalidation Shelf ATR → controls the failure-risk reference beyond the rejected edge. • REJECT READY Threshold → sets the minimum 0-100 score for the strongest rejection state. • Label and Panel Font Size → controls visual readability. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is designed to stay chart-first. The active edge zone gives the main visual reference. The midline path shows the review area. The invalidation shelf defines where the rejection context becomes weaker. The panel provides a compact decision summary without replacing the chart. The AGPro panel follows the standard first row format: one merged blue title row containing only the script name. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state and Rejection Score. 2. Check which range edge is active. 3. Review the wick rejection and close-back-inside context. 4. Compare the midline room with the invalidation shelf. 5. Treat alerts as attention markers, then evaluate broader market context. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think in terms of rejection quality, not prediction. A stronger score means multiple range-reaction conditions are aligned. A weaker score means the edge interaction may be early, noisy, too close to the midline, or vulnerable to failure. Failure Risk does not forecast a breakout. It means the active rejection context has crossed its rule-based failure shelf and should be reviewed. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not an auto-trading system • Not a guaranteed signal tool • Not a generic support/resistance map • Not a full range breakout scanner ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency The script is rule-based and depends on recent price, range, wick, volatility, and volume behavior. Timeframe changes can alter the active range, score, edge zone, midline room, and invalidation shelf. Volatility spikes can temporarily distort range boundaries. Symbols with unreliable volume may produce weaker participation readings. Outputs should always be interpreted with broader market structure, liquidity conditions, and independent risk planning. 🧠 Market Context Notes Range-edge rejection is most useful when the market is respecting a bounded structure and still has meaningful space toward the middle of the range. If price starts expanding beyond the edge, this tool intentionally shifts attention from rejection quality toward failure risk instead of calling continuation or reversal with certainty. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price probes above the active range high, prints a strong upper wick, closes back inside, and still has clear room toward the midline, the planner may classify the context as REJECT READY. When price touches the lower edge but closes weakly, lacks wick response, or sits too close to the midline, the planner may remain in EDGE WATCH or RANGE WAIT. When price crosses the invalidation shelf beyond the rejected edge, the planner marks FAILURE RISK for review. 🧱 System Philosophy AGPro planning tools are designed to help traders make a decision, not simply see another signal. This script follows that philosophy by turning range rejection into a practical decision question: Is the edge interaction valid? How strong is the rejection? Where is the midline reference? Where is the failure shelf? What should I review now? 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No script can remove uncertainty. No state, score, label, zone, line, or alert guarantees a future market outcome. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Market conditions can change quickly, and no script can eliminate uncertainty. Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions. This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use the planner to study how range edges behave across different markets and timeframes. The most useful reading comes from comparing the edge zone, wick response, midline room, failure shelf, panel state, and broader market context together.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Stop Run Continuation Planner [AGPro Series]Stop Run Continuation Planner 🧠 Core Idea Did the stop run fuel continuation instead of reversal? 📌 Overview / What it does Stop Run Continuation Planner is a chart-first liquidity continuation tool built around a specific post-sweep question: after price runs stops beyond a recent high or low, is the market reclaiming back inside for reversal, or accepting beyond the swept edge for continuation? The script maps stop-run zones, continuation references, invalidation edges, target corridors, compact state labels, alerts, a 0-100 Continuation Score, and a Reversal Risk reading. It is designed to organize observable stop-run behavior into a structured planning workflow. It does not predict future price, automate execution, or issue buy and sell commands. It is an analytical and visualization tool built for structured review. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for the cases where a stop run does not turn into a reversal. Many liquidity tools focus on the sweep itself. This script focuses on what happens after the sweep. The design supports a planner mindset: identify the stop run, measure continuation acceptance, locate invalidation, estimate target room, judge reversal risk, and decide what deserves attention next. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most stop-run tools focus on reversal reclaim behavior, generic liquidity grabs, or broad SMC-style mapping. This script does NOT treat every sweep as a reversal event. Instead, it evaluates whether price is accepting beyond the swept edge with enough quality, target room, and controlled reversal risk to justify a continuation review. ⚙ Methodology 1. Context Detection Recent high and low references are defined with a configurable lookback. 2. Reference Mapping When price sweeps beyond a reference, the script maps the swept edge, continuation side, invalidation edge, and forward target corridor. 3. Reaction Evaluation Continuation Score blends sweep depth, close acceptance, volume participation, trend-side support, and target room. Reversal Risk tracks rejection, weak acceptance, and context conflict. 4. Visual Output Qualified states produce stop-run boxes, target corridors, compact labels, alerts, and a clean AG Pro panel. 🗺 How to Read the Chart Zones = the active stop-run area between the swept reference and the sweep extreme. Corridors = the forward review area used for target room assessment. Labels = watch or continuation state markers. Colors = teal for bullish continuation context, pink for bearish continuation context, and red for invalidation pressure. Panel = Stop Run, Continuation Score, Reversal Risk, Target Room, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • Upper Run Watch → price swept a recent high, but continuation acceptance still needs confirmation. • Lower Run Watch → price swept a recent low, but continuation acceptance still needs confirmation. • Bull Continuation Ready → bullish post-sweep continuation quality is strong enough for review. • Bear Continuation Ready → bearish post-sweep continuation quality is strong enough for review. • Invalidation Review → price has moved through the active invalidation edge. • Target Review → price is testing the active target corridor. • Reversal Risk Elevated → rejection risk is growing and continuation quality is weakening. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when bullish or bearish continuation reaches ready state, when a watch condition appears, when invalidation review is triggered, when price tests the target corridor, or when reversal risk becomes elevated. Important: alerts are attention markers, not trade instructions. 🧩 Confluence Logic When sweep depth, close acceptance, volume participation, trend support, and clean target room align, the continuation context becomes stronger. When price closes back inside the swept edge or rejection grows, Reversal Risk rises and the continuation plan weakens. 📊 When to Use • After price runs above recent highs or below recent lows • During breakout continuation attempts after a liquidity sweep • In trending or expanding markets • When traders need risk, target, and next-action context after a fast sweep event ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Extremely low-liquidity markets • Very noisy micro-timeframes • News-driven candles with abnormal spread or slippage • Markets where volume data is unreliable • Situations where the user expects automated entries or guaranteed outcomes 🎛️ Key Inputs • Continuation Side → evaluates bullish events, bearish events, or both • Sensitivity → changes how strict the continuation requirements are • Stop-Run Reference Lookback → defines the sweep reference levels • Confirmation Mode → changes how much confirmation is required • Minimum Continuation Score → sets the ready threshold • Watch Score → controls earlier watch-state visibility • Invalidation Edge Buffer → adjusts the wrong-side planning edge • Target Corridor R Multiple → controls target-corridor projection • Visual settings → control zones, labels, font size, panel location, and render limits 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The script is chart-first and decision-focused. The chart carries the zones, corridors, and labels. The panel provides a compact state summary without turning the script into a crowded dashboard. The first panel row follows the AGPro standard: one merged blue header row containing only the script name. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state and Continuation Score. 2. Check whether price swept above a recent high or below a recent low. 3. Review whether price is accepting beyond the swept edge. 4. Compare Reversal Risk with the invalidation edge. 5. Review target room before treating continuation as stronger context. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A high Continuation Score means the stop run is showing stronger continuation behavior under the script rules. It does not mean continuation must happen. The invalidation edge and target corridor are planning references, not guaranteed levels. The best use is to compare the planner state with broader market structure, liquidity, volatility, and personal risk process. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not auto trading • Not guaranteed signals • Not a generic support/resistance map • Not an order-block or FVG scanner • Not a stop-run reversal tool ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency Stop-run behavior changes across symbols, sessions, and timeframes. High volatility can widen risk and target references. Low liquidity can distort sweep quality, volume response, and label timing. No rule-based script can fully account for news, spread changes, slippage, or sudden liquidity shifts. 🧠 Market Context Notes Stop runs often happen near visible highs, lows, session extremes, or recent structure. A sweep becomes more useful for continuation planning when the market accepts beyond the swept edge instead of reclaiming back inside. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price sweeps above a recent high, closes beyond the swept edge, and the Continuation Score improves, the planner may show bullish continuation readiness. When price sweeps below a recent low and continues accepting below that edge, the planner may show bearish continuation readiness. When price sweeps but closes back inside with stronger rejection, Reversal Risk can rise and the panel may shift to caution. 🧱 System Philosophy AGProLabs tools are built around structured interpretation. The goal is not to add another raw signal. The goal is to turn market behavior into a cleaner review process with score, state, risk, target, and next action. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No indicator can remove uncertainty. No score can guarantee continuation. No zone, label, panel row, alert, or corridor should be interpreted as a guaranteed outcome. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. This script is provided for educational and analytical use only. It does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes. Users remain responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and execution.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Opening Pullback Planner [AGPro Series]Opening Pullback Planner 🧠 Core Idea Is the first pullback after the open constructive, failing, or too stale to plan around? 📌 Overview / What it does Opening Pullback Planner is a session pullback decision tool built around the first meaningful retracement after the opening drive. Instead of treating the open as only a breakout moment, it waits for the drive reference to lock, then maps the pullback area where continuation quality can be evaluated. The script produces an opening pullback box, continuation trigger, failure line, target-room guide, 0-100 continuation score, risk-edge reading, compact event labels, alerts, and a clean AG Pro planning panel. It does not predict price direction, automate trades, or mark every opening range breakout. Its purpose is to organize the pullback phase after the opening drive so traders can judge whether the first reset is constructive, failing, invalidated, or no longer worth attention. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy Many session tools focus on the first opening break, the opening range, or the first impulse. The problem is that a strong open often becomes difficult to plan only after price pulls back. Opening Pullback Planner was built to fill that gap. It helps traders who study intraday continuation, first-pullback behavior, session execution, and risk-defined planning after the initial move. The design philosophy is simple: lock the opening drive, map the first pullback box, evaluate recovery quality, define the failure line, and keep the next action readable without turning the chart into a crowded signal board. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on opening range breakouts, first-drive strength, fixed session boxes, or generic pullback signals. This script does NOT clone Opening Drive Quality, does NOT act as an ORB breakout tool, and does NOT draw generic support/resistance zones. Instead, it focuses on the first pullback after the opening drive. It asks whether the pullback is deep enough to matter, shallow enough to preserve structure, recovering with acceptable close quality, holding a measurable failure line, and offering enough target room for continued review. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script builds an opening reference from either a fixed session window or the first bars of the day. This creates the drive structure that the pullback plan will use. 2. Reference Mapping After the opening reference locks, the script maps a drive-native pullback box, continuation trigger, failure line, and target-room guide. 3. Reaction Evaluation The engine evaluates pullback depth, close recovery, relative volume, volatility fit, room-to-risk, and drive quality to create a 0-100 continuation score. 4. Visual Output The chart shows the pullback box with centered text, continuation and failure references, target-room guide, compact event labels, optional markers, and the AG Pro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Opening Pullback Box = the first pullback review area derived from the locked opening drive. Continuation Trigger = the level price must reclaim or break after the pullback for continuation context to strengthen. Failure Line = the invalidation reference where the active pullback plan loses structural integrity. Target Guide = a projected target-room reference based on the opening drive range. Labels = event markers for drive retain, pullback test, constructive recovery, trigger readiness, pullback risk, failure line, stale plan, and target check. Colors = teal for bullish continuation context, pink for bearish or invalid context, amber for caution, and indigo for structural emphasis. Panel = the decision layer showing Pullback State, Drive Side, Continuation Score, Risk Edge, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • DRIVE RETAIN → the opening drive quality is strong enough to map a pullback plan. • PULLBACK TEST → price has entered the opening pullback box. • CONSTRUCTIVE → pullback depth and recovery quality are acceptable inside the model. • TRIGGER READY → price has moved through the continuation trigger after a valid pullback. • PULLBACK RISK → the pullback is becoming too deep, slow, or weak for clean continuation review. • FAILURE LINE → the active pullback plan has lost structural integrity. • PULLBACK STALE → the first pullback plan did not resolve inside the review window. • TARGET CHECK → price reached the projected target-room guide. 🔔 Alerts Logic The script includes alerts for: • Opening Pullback Plan Armed → a qualified opening drive mapped the first pullback plan. • Opening Pullback Test → price is testing the pullback box. • Constructive Opening Pullback → the pullback is recovering constructively. • Opening Pullback Continuation Trigger → the continuation trigger is active after the pullback. • Opening Pullback Failure Line Broken → the plan has broken its failure reference. • Opening Pullback Plan Expired → the first pullback plan became stale before confirmation. • Opening Pullback Target Check → price reached the target-room guide. Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions. 🧩 Confluence Logic The context becomes stronger when the opening drive has acceptable quality, the first pullback reaches the planned box without violating the failure line, recovery closes improve, volume does not collapse during recovery, and target room remains clean. The context becomes weaker when the pullback is too deep, recovery is poor, the plan takes too long to resolve, or price violates the failure line. 📊 When to Use • Intraday session planning after the opening move. • First-pullback continuation review. • Daily chart review when the higher-timeframe fallback is enabled. • Markets where the opening drive often creates a useful early reference. • Stocks, indices, futures, crypto, or FX charts where the selected opening session is meaningful. • Review workflows where risk edge and target room need to be visible. ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Very low-liquidity markets. • Extremely noisy opens with unstable spreads. • News-driven bars that distort the opening reference. • Higher timeframes where session pullback structure is not meaningful. • Markets where the selected opening window does not represent real participation. 🎛️ Key Inputs • Opening Reference Mode → chooses between a fixed session window and first bars of day. • Opening Drive Window → defines the drive reference used before pullback mapping begins. • Higher Timeframe Fallback → keeps daily, weekly, and monthly charts visually useful by mapping broader opening references. • Sensitivity → adjusts how strict the planner is with pullback recovery and score requirements. • Constructive Score Threshold → controls when constructive pullback labels can appear. • Pullback Box Shallow / Ideal / Deep → define the preferred retracement area. • Continuation Trigger Buffer ATR → adjusts the trigger line beyond the drive extreme. • Failure Line Buffer ATR → adjusts the invalidation reference beyond the pullback box. • Target Guide Range Multiple → controls the projected target-room guide. • Visual settings → control box, lines, labels, markers, projection, label limits, and font size. • Panel settings → control panel visibility, location, theme, and font size. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is chart-first and decision-focused. The main visual object is one opening pullback box with centered state text, supported by a continuation trigger, failure line, and target guide. The panel follows the AGPro public-release standard with one merged blue header row containing only the script name. The five panel rows are Pullback State, Drive Side, Continuation Score, Risk Edge, and Action. Labels are compact, capped, and offset away from candles so the chart stays active without becoming crowded. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Let the opening reference lock. 2. Read the panel to see whether the drive retained enough quality. 3. Watch whether price tests the opening pullback box. 4. Evaluate the continuation score, recovery state, risk edge, and failure line. 5. Treat alerts and labels as review prompts, not instructions. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A strong continuation score means the pullback is controlled, recovering cleanly, preserving the failure line, and keeping useful room to the projected target guide. A constructive label means the first pullback is behaving better inside the model. It does not mean continuation must occur. A failure-line label means the plan has lost the structure it needed for this specific pullback framework. The best use comes from combining the panel state with broader market context, liquidity, volatility, higher-timeframe structure, and personal risk rules. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine. • Not financial advice. • Not auto trading. • Not guaranteed signals. • Not a generic support/resistance map. • Not an order block or FVG scanner. • Not an Opening Drive Quality clone. • Not a full opening range breakout system. ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency Timeframe selection affects the opening reference and the pullback box. A 5-minute chart and a 15-minute chart can produce different plans. Session definitions matter. The selected opening window should match the asset and market being studied. Higher-timeframe fallback mode is a broader chart-reference layer. It should be read as a weekly, monthly, or yearly opening-pullback framework rather than a literal intraday open. Volatility changes can expand or compress risk, target, and pullback behavior. Low liquidity, abnormal spreads, and high-impact news can reduce the usefulness of any opening pullback model. 🧠 Market Context Notes The first pullback after the open can be useful because it tests whether the opening move still has sponsorship. A shallow pullback may show strength but offer limited risk clarity. A deep pullback may offer a better reset but also higher failure risk. This script keeps that decision visible by separating drive retention, pullback quality, continuation trigger, failure line, and target room. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price locks a bullish opening drive, pulls back into the mapped box, holds above the failure line, and recovers toward the continuation trigger, the panel may shift toward a constructive or ready state. When price enters the pullback box but keeps closing weakly or pushes beyond the deep boundary, the planner may mark pullback risk. When price breaks the failure line, the opening pullback plan is no longer structurally intact inside this model. 🧱 System Philosophy Opening Pullback Planner follows the AGPro Series decision-engine approach: a script should help the trader evaluate validity, strength, risk, target room, and next action instead of only printing another signal. The tool is built to make one session behavior easier to read: the first pullback after the opening drive. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No script can provide certainty. No opening pullback model can guarantee continuation, reversal, or profitability. This script provides structured context only. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own decisions. This script does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes. 📚 Educational Note Use this script as an educational planning and visualization tool. The strongest use comes from reading the first opening pullback together with broader market structure, liquidity, volatility, and personal risk rules.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Pullback Acceptance Planner [AGPro Series]Pullback Acceptance Planner 🧠 Core Idea Is the current trend pullback being accepted as continuation, or rejected as failure? 📌 Overview / What it does Pullback Acceptance Planner is a public-free TradingView planner built to evaluate one specific decision point: the moment price pulls back into a trend-support area and the trader needs to know whether the retracement is being accepted or rejected. The script maps a live pullback acceptance pocket, accepted/rejected state labels, an invalidation risk shelf, a target-room band, and a clean AGPro decision panel. It converts pullback depth, close acceptance, trend support, volume behavior, invalidation distance, and target room into a 0-100 Acceptance Score. It does not predict price direction, automate entries, or label every small retracement. Its purpose is to make the pullback review process cleaner, more visual, and more decision-focused. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built because many pullback tools stop at showing where price touched a moving average, trend line, or generic zone. That is not enough for a trader who needs to decide whether the pullback is still constructive. Pullback Acceptance Planner fills that gap by focusing on acceptance behavior after the pullback reaches the planning pocket. It helps traders review trend-side support, close quality, participation, risk distance, and remaining room in one structured view. The mindset is practical: do not chase every pullback, and do not treat every retracement as a signal. Wait for the pullback to show whether it is being accepted or rejected. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most pullback tools focus on moving-average touches, simple continuation markers, or generic trend-risk labels. This script does NOT clone Low Volume Pullback Zones, Trend Pullback Risk Planner, Opening Drive Quality, SuperTrend pullback tools, or broad continuation dashboards. Instead, it answers a narrower question: after price enters a general trend pullback pocket, is the close behavior strong enough to call the pullback accepted, or is the invalidation shelf being lost? That acceptance-first framing is the core identity of the script. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The engine reads EMA stack alignment, base EMA slope, ATR structure, and the selected planning side to determine whether a bullish or bearish pullback context is active. 2. Reference Mapping The script builds a pullback acceptance pocket around the base EMA, then maps an invalidation risk shelf behind the pocket and a target-room band toward the nearest prior obstruction. 3. Reaction Evaluation The 0-100 Acceptance Score evaluates pullback depth, close acceptance beyond the pocket edge, trend support, volume behavior, invalidation distance, and target room. 4. Visual Output The chart displays the acceptance pocket, risk shelf, target-room band, compact state labels, alerts, and a five-row AGPro planner panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the pullback acceptance pocket, invalidation risk shelf, and target-room band. Labels = current state changes such as PB ACCEPTED, PB REJECTED, ACCEPT WATCH, ROOM REVIEW, or PB FORMING. Colors = bullish acceptance uses teal, bearish acceptance uses pink, watch/room review uses yellow or indigo, and rejection uses red. Panel = the decision summary: Pullback State, Acceptance Score, Risk Edge, Room, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • PB ACCEPTED → price closed beyond the active pullback pocket with enough score quality. • ACCEPT WATCH → pullback context is improving but still needs cleaner confirmation. • ROOM REVIEW → acceptance quality exists, but nearby obstruction leaves limited target room. • PB FORMING → price is inside or near the pocket and the planner is still building context. • PB REJECTED → price crossed the invalidation shelf and the active pullback context failed. • TREND WAIT / NO PULLBACK → there is no active pullback acceptance context to review. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when a bullish or bearish pullback reaches accepted state, when acceptance watch appears, when target room needs review, when the pullback is rejected, or when a major follow-through event appears after acceptance. Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions. 🧩 Confluence Logic The context becomes stronger when trend side, clean pullback depth, constructive close acceptance, controlled or recovering volume, reasonable invalidation distance, and sufficient target room align at the same time. The score is intentionally multi-factor so a single moving-average touch cannot create a high-quality state by itself. 📊 When to Use • Trending markets with clean retracements • Swing or intraday continuation review • Markets where pullback behavior matters more than raw trend direction • Crypto, forex, stocks, indices, and commodities with enough liquidity • Situations where a trader wants an invalidation reference and target-room read before acting ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Very low-liquidity symbols • Extremely noisy sideways chop • News-driven spikes where ATR and trend structure distort quickly • Ultra-low timeframes with unstable spread or poor execution quality • Markets where price repeatedly crosses the base EMA without directional structure 🎛️ Key Inputs • Planning Side → chooses Auto, Bullish Pullback, or Bearish Pullback. • Sensitivity → changes trend strictness and scoring behavior. • EMA Lengths → define the trend stack and acceptance pocket anchor. • ATR Length → normalizes pocket width, labels, risk shelf, and target room. • Pullback Review Window → controls how long a pocket touch remains active. • ACCEPTED Threshold → sets the minimum score for accepted-state labels. • Label / Panel Settings → control visibility, location, theme, font size, label size, and label density. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is chart-first. The main chart objects are the acceptance pocket, risk shelf, and target-room band, each with centered text when displayed. The panel uses the AGPro standard: one merged blue header row containing only the script name, followed by five decision rows. The layout is intentionally compact so the chart stays premium, readable, and useful on first glance. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel to identify Pullback State and Acceptance Score. 2. Check whether price is inside, above, or below the acceptance pocket. 3. Review the invalidation risk shelf before interpreting an accepted state. 4. Check the target-room band to see whether the path is open or obstructed. 5. Treat labels and alerts as review markers, not automatic trade decisions. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A higher score means the pullback has cleaner depth, stronger close behavior, better trend support, healthier volume behavior, more reasonable invalidation distance, and better room. An accepted label means the pullback has met the script's rule-based acceptance conditions. It does not mean price must continue. A rejected label means the pullback context failed according to the invalidation shelf. It does not mean the market must reverse. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not auto trading • Not guaranteed signals • Not a generic support/resistance zone tool • Not an order block, FVG, or broad SMC map ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency • Timeframe differences can change how clean the pocket and score appear. • Volatility expansion can widen risk and distort close acceptance. • Low-liquidity markets can make volume behavior less reliable. • Strong news candles can cross both pocket and target references too quickly. • The script uses rule-based approximations, not future knowledge. 🧠 Market Context Notes Pullback acceptance often depends on whether price can return toward trend support without losing structure. A constructive pullback usually keeps risk contained, avoids aggressive countertrend volume, and then shows acceptance through the pocket edge. This script turns that process into a visual planner so the user can review risk, room, and state in one place. 🧾 Use Case Examples When a bullish trend pulls back into the acceptance pocket, the script may print ACCEPT WATCH first. If price later closes above the pocket edge with enough score quality, the state can shift to PB ACCEPTED. When a bearish trend rallies into the pocket but then closes back below the acceptance edge, the script can mark bearish acceptance. If price crosses the invalidation shelf instead, the state shifts toward rejection. 🧱 System Philosophy Pullback Acceptance Planner follows the AGPro planner-style direction: the chart should not only show another signal. It should help the trader evaluate setup validity, strength, risk, target room, and next action. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No script can provide certainty. No score can guarantee outcome. This tool is designed for structured review and educational analysis. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Market conditions can change quickly, and historical or rule-based signals do not guarantee future results. Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions. This script does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use the script to study how pullbacks behave around trend support, invalidation shelves, and target-room constraints. The best value comes from comparing the planner state with broader market context.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Failed Pullback Reversal Planner [AGPro Series]Failed Pullback Reversal Planner 🧠 Core Idea Did the pullback fail to recover, and is it now creating a reversal-warning context? 📌 Overview / What it does Failed Pullback Reversal Planner is a chart-first reversal risk planner built for one specific situation: a pullback inside an existing trend stops behaving like a healthy retracement and begins losing control. The script maps a failed pullback pocket, control-loss rail, invalidation reference, target-room guide, compact state labels, alerts, and a clean AG Pro panel. It converts pullback depth, failed recovery, close behavior, volume response, and follow-through into a 0-100 Failure Score. It does not predict future price movement, automate entries, or issue guaranteed buy/sell signals. Its role is to organize failed-pullback context into a clearer decision framework. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built because many pullback tools only focus on continuation quality. They often ask whether the pullback is healthy enough to resume the original trend. Failed Pullback Reversal Planner focuses on the opposite decision layer. It asks whether the pullback failed to recover, lost the control reference, and now deserves reversal-risk review. The design supports traders who want cleaner structure, risk location, target-room context, and next-action guidance without turning every candle into a signal. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on pullback continuation, moving-average bounces, or generic reversal markers. This script does NOT clone Pullback Acceptance Planner, Low Volume Pullback Zones, Trend Continuation Quality, or a generic reversal signal indicator. Instead, it treats failed pullbacks as a planning problem. Price must first enter a pullback context, then fail recovery around a control rail, then show enough close quality, volume response, and follow-through to raise reversal-risk state. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script identifies former bullish or bearish trend context using fast, base, and slow EMA alignment. 2. Reference Mapping It builds a failed pullback pocket, control-loss rail, invalidation reference, and target-room guide using ATR-normalized logic. 3. Reaction Evaluation It scores pullback depth, failed recovery, close against the former trend, volume response, and nearby follow-through. 4. Visual Output It displays concept-native zones, centered zone labels, compact event labels, guide rails, alerts, and a premium AG Pro planning panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the failed pullback pocket and reversal-risk zone. Labels = pullback test, control-loss, reversal-risk, or reset markers. Colors = teal shows bullish reversal-risk context, pink shows bearish reversal-risk context, amber shows watch context, red shows control-loss or risk context, and indigo shows reset/recovery context. Panel = a compact decision dashboard showing Pullback State, Failure Score, Reversal Risk, Invalidation, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • PB TEST → a recent pullback is being monitored for failed-recovery behavior. • CTRL LOST → price has lost the control reference but has not fully qualified the warning state. • REV RISK → failed pullback context has enough score to deserve reversal-risk review. • RESET → optional marker showing that price reclaimed the invalidation reference and the failed-pullback plan should be reset. • NO SETUP → no active failed-pullback context is present. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when the planner detects a monitored failed-pullback setup, a reversal-risk warning, invalidation/reset behavior, or meaningful follow-through after control loss. Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest failed-pullback context appears when pullback depth is meaningful, price loses the control rail, the candle closes against the former trend, volume supports the shift, and follow-through begins beyond nearby structure. When these components align, the Failure Score rises and the panel moves from watch context toward reversal-risk review. 📊 When to Use • Trend pullbacks that start losing recovery quality • Potential reversal transitions after a failed retracement • Markets where a prior trend is weakening around a control reference • Situations where invalidation and target-room context matter ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Very low liquidity markets • Extremely noisy sideways conditions • News-driven volatility spikes • Markets with no clean prior trend context • Symbols where volume behavior is unreliable 🎛️ Key Inputs • Sensitivity → controls how strict the failed-pullback model is. • Former Trend Side → restricts evaluation to bullish-trend or bearish-trend failures when needed. • Failure Window Bars → defines how long after a pullback touch control-loss behavior can qualify. • Control-Loss Buffer ATR → adjusts the rail used to mark failed recovery. • Invalidation Buffer ATR → controls the reset reference beyond the fast trend anchor. • Label and Panel Settings → control panel location, theme, font size, label size, label spacing, and visible label count. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is built around a clean AG Pro decision panel and chart-first planning visuals. The first panel row uses the AG Pro merged blue header standard with only the script name. The remaining rows focus on the active decision: pullback state, failure score, reversal risk, invalidation, and action. The chart uses a focused failed pullback pocket, a reversal-risk zone, guide rails, and compact labels. The goal is a premium planning view without crowded generic signals. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state. 2. Check whether a pullback test is active. 3. Watch whether price loses the control rail. 4. Review the Failure Score and reversal-risk label. 5. Compare the invalidation reference and target-room guide before interpreting the context. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think in terms of failed recovery quality, not prediction. A higher Failure Score means the current pullback has stronger failed-recovery characteristics across depth, control loss, close behavior, volume, and follow-through. A control-loss state means the setup is weakening but may still need more confirmation. A reset state means the failed-pullback idea has been reclaimed and should be reassessed. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not auto trading • Not guaranteed signals • Not a generic pullback continuation indicator ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency • Timeframe differences can change how pullback depth and failure windows appear. • High volatility can distort ATR-normalized rails. • Low-volume instruments may reduce the reliability of the volume component. • Sideways markets can create repeated failed-pullback noise. • Outputs should be interpreted with broader market structure. 🧠 Market Context Notes Failed pullbacks often matter when a market was expected to recover in the direction of the prior trend but instead loses the control reference. The script does not assume that every failed recovery becomes a full reversal. It simply marks when the context is strong enough to deserve review. 🧾 Use Case Examples When a bullish trend pulls back toward the fast/base EMA area, fails to recover, and closes below the control rail with stronger participation, the planner may raise bearish reversal-risk context. When a bearish trend pulls back upward, fails to reject lower, and closes above the control rail with follow-through, the planner may raise bullish reversal-risk context. 🧱 System Philosophy The script is built around decision quality. It does not try to add another signal layer. It asks whether a specific market behavior is valid, how strong it is, where it is invalidated, and what should be reviewed next. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No guarantees. No certainty. The script organizes observable market behavior into a structured analytical view. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions. This script does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes. 📚 Educational Note Use the planner as an educational framework for studying failed pullbacks, recovery quality, control loss, and reversal-risk context.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Expansion Failure Planner [AGPro Series]Expansion Failure Planner 🧠 Core Idea Did volatility expansion create real travel, or did it fail back inside the prior structure? 📌 Overview / What it does Expansion Failure Planner is a public-free TradingView indicator built to evaluate failed volatility expansion attempts. It detects when price expands beyond a recent range edge, then tracks whether the move produces meaningful travel or quickly loses the edge. The script produces a failed expansion corridor, expansion-edge guide, risk shelf, return-to-range target guide, compact state labels, alerts, and a clean AG Pro planning panel. It does not predict future price direction or automate trade decisions. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who do not only want to see that volatility expanded. They want to know whether the expansion still has quality, whether failure risk is rising, and what context should be reviewed next. The design supports a decision-first workflow: identify the expansion attempt, measure failure risk, review target room, and decide whether the context deserves attention. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most volatility tools focus on expansion, squeeze release, or breakout continuation. This script does NOT act as a generic breakout signal, generic S/R zone, or continuation-only volatility map. Instead, it focuses on one narrow question: did the expansion fail before producing real travel? ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script defines a prior range and watches for a volatility expansion attempt beyond that range edge. 2. Reference Mapping It stores the expansion edge, expansion extreme, prior range midpoint, and return-to-range target area. 3. Reaction Evaluation The planner scores failed travel using ATR expansion, close-back-inside behavior, missing follow-through, volume response, and range re-entry quality. 4. Visual Output It draws the failed expansion corridor, expansion edge, risk shelf, return target, compact labels, and a premium AG Pro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the failed expansion corridor between the original edge and the expansion extreme. Labels = expansion attempts, failure-ready states, watch states, hold states, and reset context. Colors = teal for upside expansion attempts, pink for downside expansion attempts, yellow for watch context, and indigo for edge/hold review. Panel = the preferred viewing timeframe, current expansion state, 0-100 failure risk, reclaim status, target room, and next action. 🚦 Signals & States • UP EXP / DN EXP → a volatility expansion attempt has been detected. • UP FAIL / DN FAIL → the expansion failed back inside the prior structure with enough score. • WATCH → failure risk is developing but confirmation is incomplete. • HOLD → expansion is still holding beyond the edge. • RESET / NO FAIL → the active failure window expired or real travel invalidated the failure context. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when expansion failure reaches ready status, when watch context develops, when expansion holds beyond the edge, or when the failure window resets. Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest context appears when ATR expansion, edge loss, missing follow-through, range re-entry, and participation align. When these components agree, the failure risk score increases. 📊 When to Use • After volatility expansion attempts • Around range-edge probes • During breakout failure review • When a move expands but does not travel • When price quickly returns inside prior structure ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Extremely low-liquidity symbols • Very noisy micro ranges • News-driven candles with abnormal gaps • Markets where volume data is unreliable • Charts where the prior range is not structurally meaningful 🎛️ Key Inputs • Sensitivity → changes how strict the failure model is. • Prior Range Lookback → defines the structure used for expansion reference. • Expansion Bar ATR → controls how large a candle must be to qualify. • Required Real Travel ATR → defines how much progress the expansion should produce. • Confirmation Mode → controls close/volume/strict confirmation. • Visual Settings → control corridor, guides, labels, projection, and label size. • Panel Settings → control panel visibility, location, theme, font size, and best-viewed timeframe guidance. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The panel is designed as a compact planning cockpit. The first row uses the AGPro merged blue header standard, while the remaining rows show best-viewed timeframe guidance, state, score, reclaim status, target room, and action. The visual hierarchy keeps the chart readable: one active corridor, clear guide lines, and controlled labels. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state. 2. Check whether price is above or below the expansion edge. 3. Review the failed expansion corridor. 4. Compare failure risk with target room. 5. Use alerts as attention markers, not decisions. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think in terms of failed travel, not prediction. A high score means the script detected stronger failure characteristics. A low score means expansion may still be holding, or failure evidence is not strong enough. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not auto trading • Not guaranteed signals • Not a generic breakout indicator • Not a generic support/resistance zone map ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency • Timeframe differences can change expansion and failure structure. • Volatility spikes can distort ATR-based scoring. • Volume quality varies by market. • Fast markets can move beyond the corridor before confirmation. • Outputs should be interpreted within broader market context. 🧠 Market Context Notes Expansion failure often matters when volatility appears strong but cannot create distance. This script focuses on that transition point between momentum attempt and failed travel. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price expands above a range, stalls quickly, closes back inside the edge, and fails to build distance, the planner can mark an upside expansion failure. When price expands below a range, loses downside follow-through, and re-enters the structure, the planner can mark a downside expansion failure. 🧱 System Philosophy AGPro tools are built to reduce chart ambiguity by turning raw market events into structured decision context. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No indicator can provide certainty. This script provides rule-based context only. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own decisions. This script does not provide financial advice or guaranteed trading outcomes. 📚 Educational Note Use the script as a structured learning and review tool for expansion failure behavior, failed travel, and volatility response.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Momentum Pullback Continuation [AGPro Series]Momentum Pullback Continuation 🧠 Core Idea Is a momentum pullback resetting cleanly for continuation, or is the move losing its execution quality? 📌 Overview / What it does Momentum Pullback Continuation is a chart-first continuation planner built for traders who review momentum-driven trends after a controlled pullback. The script maps a momentum reset pocket, continuation trigger line, invalidation rail, target-room corridor, state labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro planning panel. It converts trend support, momentum slope, pullback depth, close recovery, volume behavior, and target room into a 0-100 Continuation Score. The default publication preset is 1H-focused. Higher timeframes can be tested from the inputs, but the strongest intended use case is hourly momentum pullback review. It does not predict price, automate entries, or turn every trend pullback into a signal. It is a structured decision tool for evaluating whether the current momentum reset deserves closer review. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built to fill the gap between basic momentum readings and practical continuation planning. Many traders can see that momentum exists, but the harder question is whether the pullback is resetting in a controlled way or damaging the continuation structure. This planner focuses on that decision layer. The design supports a disciplined workflow: identify the active momentum side, inspect the reset pocket, evaluate the score, locate the invalidation rail, compare target room, and read the next-action state. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on momentum oscillators, moving-average direction, divergence events, or generic continuation labels. This script does NOT clone Hidden Divergence Continuation Zones, Trend Continuation Quality, Structural Momentum Oscillator, ROC Momentum Shift Map, or a generic pullback signal map. Instead, it treats the pullback as a planning event. The main output is not a buy/sell marker. It is a momentum reset decision state with score, risk edge, target-room context, and action guidance. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script identifies bullish or bearish momentum context using an EMA stack, normalized trend slope, and smoothed rate-of-change pressure. 2. Reference Mapping It builds a concept-native Momentum Reset Pocket around the active trend support area, then maps a continuation trigger line, invalidation rail, and target-room guide. 3. Reaction Evaluation The score model evaluates momentum slope, pullback depth, trend support, close recovery, volume behavior, and available target room. 4. Visual Output The chart shows the reset pocket, target-room corridor, trigger and risk guides, compact event labels, sparse context labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Reset Pocket = the area where a momentum pullback is expected to stabilize before continuation can be reviewed. Trigger Line = the fast continuation reference that price needs to recover after the reset. Invalidation Rail = the planning line where the active reset context is considered lost. Target-Room Corridor = the forward planning area between current price and the target-room guide. Labels = RESET, WATCH, READY, WEAK, and INVALID attention markers. Colors = teal marks bullish continuation context, pink marks bearish continuation context, amber marks weak or caution states, indigo marks watch/target-room context, and red marks invalidation. Panel = summarizes Momentum State, Pullback Quality, Continuation Score, Risk Edge, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • RESET → price has interacted with the momentum reset pocket. • WATCH → the reset is developing, but recovery or score quality is not complete. • READY → momentum, pullback depth, recovery, volume context, and target room align strongly enough for structured review. • WEAK → the pullback is too deep, low quality, or not recovering well enough. • INVALID → price has crossed the invalidation rail and the active reset context should be rebuilt. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when READY, WATCH, WEAK RESET, or INVALID states appear. Each alert is an attention marker tied to the rule-based state engine. Alerts are not trade instructions and do not guarantee that continuation will occur. 🧩 Confluence Logic The continuation context becomes stronger when trend support, positive momentum slope, controlled pullback depth, clean close recovery, acceptable volume behavior, and target-room availability align. The script intentionally requires multiple conditions instead of labeling every pullback inside a trend as meaningful. 📊 When to Use • Directional markets with visible momentum pressure • 1H charts and nearby intraday momentum review • Trend continuation review workflows • Pullbacks after a clear momentum impulse • Situations where risk edge and target room matter before acting • Markets where volume and close behavior are readable enough to support context ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Low-liquidity symbols with unreliable candles or volume • Extremely choppy markets with frequent trend-side flips • News-driven volatility where reset structure changes too quickly • Very flat markets where momentum pressure is absent • Instruments where the active pullback is far beyond the mapped risk edge 🎛️ Key Inputs • Continuation Side → selects Auto, Bullish Only, or Bearish Only evaluation. • Timeframe Profile → keeps the default script behavior focused on 1H charts, with optional broader intraday or all-timeframe testing. • Sensitivity → adjusts how strict the momentum reset model is. • EMA settings → define trigger, reset, and support references. • Momentum ROC settings → control the internal momentum pressure reading. • Reset Pocket Width → changes how wide the reset area is around trend support. • READY / WATCH Score → sets state thresholds. • Visual settings → control zones, guide lines, labels, panel theme, panel location, and font sizes. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is designed to stay chart-first and practical. The reset pocket and target-room corridor provide the main visual planning structure. Labels are compact and spaced with cooldown controls. The AGPro panel uses a single merged blue header row and focuses only on the core decision fields. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel Momentum State. 2. Check whether price is interacting with the Momentum Reset Pocket. 3. Compare Pullback Quality and Continuation Score. 4. Locate the Risk Edge and Target-Room Corridor. 5. Use the Action row to decide whether the context is READY, still WATCH, weak, invalid, or only worth scanning. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think of the script as a continuation readiness map, not a command system. A higher score means the active momentum pullback matches the script's internal definition of cleaner continuation structure. A lower score means one or more components are missing, such as trend support, recovery quality, volume context, or target room. The invalidation rail is a planning boundary for the active context. It is not a guaranteed stop level and should not replace the user's own risk process. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT This script is not a prediction engine. This script is not financial advice. This script is not an auto-trading system. This script does not provide guaranteed signals. This script does not replace independent confirmation, position sizing, or risk management. ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency Momentum continuation behavior changes across symbols, sessions, and timeframes. The default 1H Focus profile intentionally suppresses active labels, zones, and alerts outside the intended hourly review window. Low-liquidity markets can distort volume behavior and reset quality. High volatility can widen risk edges and reduce target-room clarity. Sideways conditions can create repeated resets without clean continuation. No rule-based script can fully account for sudden news, spread changes, slippage, or discretionary execution constraints. 🧠 Market Context Notes Momentum pullbacks are often more useful when the broader trend remains intact, the pullback is controlled rather than impulsive against trend, and the recovery candle shows clear close quality. The best reads usually come from alignment between structure, momentum, volume, volatility, and clean forward room. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price pulls into the reset pocket during bullish momentum and then recovers the trigger line with a stronger score, the script can mark READY for continuation review. When price enters the pocket but momentum slope fades and pullback depth becomes excessive, the script can mark WEAK RESET. When price crosses the invalidation rail, the active reset context is treated as lost and should be rebuilt. 🧱 System Philosophy AGPro tools are built around structured interpretation. The goal is not to create more chart noise. The goal is to turn visible market behavior into a cleaner decision framework: context, quality, risk, target room, and next action. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No script can provide certainty. No score guarantees continuation. The output should be interpreted as structured context, not as a promise of future price movement. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own analysis, confirmation, position sizing, and decisions. This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use the planner to study how momentum resets behave across different symbols and timeframes. Over time, compare READY, WATCH, WEAK RESET, and INVALID states to understand which environments produce cleaner continuation structure.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Volatility Cooldown Planner [AGPro Series]Volatility Cooldown Planner 🧠 Core Idea Has volatility cooled down enough to read the chart again? 📌 Overview / What it does Volatility Cooldown Planner is a chart-first volatility risk and readiness tool built for the period after a sharp ATR spike, wide-range candle, or large wick event. Instead of printing another directional signal, the script asks whether the market is still unstable, cooling, ready for review, or readable again. It produces a spike box, a forward cooldown band, spike rails, unsafe volatility warnings, readiness labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro planning panel. The script does not predict news events, identify hidden catalysts, automate decisions, or tell users what to buy or sell. Its role is to organize post-spike volatility context into a readable decision workflow. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who often face the same problem after sudden volatility: the chart is active, but not always readable. Many tools focus on volatility expansion, squeeze release, regime classification, or breakout confirmation. Those can be useful, but they do not always answer the practical question that appears after a spike: should the trader keep reading this structure now, or wait until volatility load normalizes? The design philosophy is simple: after unstable volatility, the first decision is not direction. The first decision is whether the chart is clean enough to evaluate. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most volatility tools focus on detecting expansion, squeeze release, high ATR regimes, or dramatic candles. This script does NOT try to detect news events, does not clone a volatility expansion planner, does not act as a stop-run model, and does not classify broad volatility cycles. Instead, it studies the cooling process after the spike. The main output is a 0-100 Cooldown Score and a next-action state that separates UNSAFE, TOO EARLY, COOLING, READINESS REVIEW, and CHART READABLE conditions. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Spike Detection The engine identifies spike context using ATR Load, single-bar range expansion, and dominant wick size. 2. Cooldown Mapping When a spike appears, the script draws a spike box and a forward cooldown band. The band becomes the active review area for post-spike readability. 3. Readiness Evaluation The model scores ATR load normalization, range contraction, time decay, close-to-close stability, and wick pressure. 4. Visual Output The planner displays the active state through labels, rails, band color, alert conditions, and a compact AGPro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Spike Box = the original volatility shock area. Cooldown Band = the forward review window where the script evaluates whether volatility is becoming readable again. Spike Rails = the upper and lower reference boundaries from the spike event. They are volatility context rails, not entry or stop instructions. Readability Trail = an optional lightweight dot layer for users who want extra chart presence between major labels. It is disabled by default for a cleaner publication preset. Unsafe Label = volatility has reloaded before cooldown completed. Ready / Readable Labels = the cooldown score has reached a stronger review state. Panel = a compact decision view showing Spike State, Cooldown Score, Volatility Load, Readiness, Action, and Best View. 🚦 Signals & States • SPIKE → a new volatility shock has been registered. • UNSAFE → volatility reloaded before the cooldown process became stable. • TOO EARLY → not enough bars have passed after the spike. • COOLING → volatility is improving, but readiness is not strong enough yet. • READINESS REVIEW → conditions are strong enough to review the chart again. • CHART READABLE → ATR load has normalized and the cooldown score is strong. 🔔 Alerts Logic Volatility Spike Registered triggers when ATR load, range expansion, or wick pressure qualifies as a spike event. Unsafe Volatility Reload triggers when volatility expands again during the active cooldown window. Cooldown Readiness Review triggers when the cooldown score reaches the readiness threshold. Chart Readable After Cooldown triggers when volatility load and cooldown quality both reach the strongest readable state. Alerts are attention markers, not trade instructions. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest cooldown state appears when multiple conditions align: ATR load falls toward the target area, recent ranges contract, close-to-close movement stabilizes, wick pressure fades, and enough time has passed after the spike. When these conditions align, the chart becomes more readable under the script's rules. This does not create certainty or directional prediction. 📊 When to Use • After sharp ATR spikes • After wide-range candles • After large wick events • After fast liquidation-style movement • During post-event stabilization • When the chart feels too unstable to interpret cleanly • Best visual fit: 4H charts and intraday-swing volatility review • Daily charts can work for broader context, but they may look more sparse because fewer cooldown events appear ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Very low-liquidity markets • Illiquid sessions with unreliable candle structure • Extreme news volatility where conditions keep changing quickly • Symbols with irregular gaps or poor feed quality • As a standalone directional entry system 🎛️ Key Inputs • Sensitivity → controls how demanding spike detection is. • ATR Length → normalizes spike size and label offsets. • ATR Baseline Length → defines the local volatility baseline. • Cooldown Review Window → controls how long the spike remains under review. • Cooldown Target ATR Load → defines the internal volatility load target for readability. • Readiness Score Threshold → defines when the panel can mark readiness review. • Visual settings → control spike boxes, cooldown bands, rails, markers, and background warnings. • Readability Trail → optional subtle chart presence during active cooldown or elevated volatility. • Label and Panel Font Size → control chart labels and panel readability. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is designed to stay chart-first. The spike box explains where the instability started. The cooldown band shows the active review window. The centered band label gives the current state without forcing the user into a lower-pane dashboard. The default visual preset keeps the chart calmer by hiding standalone spike event labels, sparse context labels, label scores, readable-upgrade follow-up labels, and the optional readability trail. Users can enable those layers when they want a denser visual review. The AGPro panel follows the public-release standard with one merged blue header row containing only the panel title. The remaining rows focus on decision context rather than raw data overload, including a Best View row that points users toward the 4H chart when needed. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel Readiness and Action fields. 2. Start with a 4H chart when preparing a visual review or publication screenshot. 3. Check whether the chart is still inside an active cooldown band. 4. Watch Volatility Load and Cooldown Score. 5. Treat UNSAFE as a warning that the chart may still be unstable. 6. Treat READINESS REVIEW or CHART READABLE as a prompt to evaluate broader structure, not as an automatic trade command. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A high cooldown score means volatility has normalized under the script's rule set. It does not mean price must continue, reverse, or respect the spike rails. The best use is as a readability filter after unstable movement. It helps the trader decide whether the market is still too hot, cooling, or clean enough to study again. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not auto trading • Not guaranteed signals • Not a news-event detector • Not a volatility expansion breakout tool • Not a stop-run or liquidity-sweep model ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency This script uses standard TradingView OHLCV data and ATR-based measurements. It cannot identify the real-world cause of volatility. It cannot know whether a spike came from news, liquidation, session flow, thin liquidity, or normal order flow. Timeframe selection, symbol liquidity, session structure, and volatility regime can affect how quickly cooldown states appear. The default preset is visually best suited to 4H charts; lower timeframes may require stricter inputs, while Daily charts may naturally show fewer events. 🧠 Market Context Notes Volatility often becomes hardest to interpret immediately after a sharp event. Some spikes create clean follow-through. Others create unstable noise, whipsaw, or delayed normalization. This planner focuses on the cooling process, not the directional outcome. 🧾 Use Case Examples When a wide candle appears and the panel shows UNSAFE, the trader can wait for volatility load to normalize before interpreting follow-through. When a spike box remains active but the score rises into READINESS REVIEW, the trader can compare the cooldown band with broader structure, trend, liquidity, and personal execution rules. When the panel reaches CHART READABLE, the market is no longer classified as overheated by the script, but the user still needs independent context. 🧱 System Philosophy AGPro tools are designed to convert market structure into decision context. This script follows that philosophy by turning post-spike volatility into a readable workflow: identify the shock, monitor the cooldown, evaluate the readiness state, and avoid treating every fast move as immediately actionable. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No script can remove uncertainty. No cooldown state guarantees that the next move will be clean. The output is a structured analytical context, not certainty. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions. This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use the planner to study how volatility behaves after spikes, how long different symbols take to normalize, and how readability changes across timeframes.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Continuation Acceptance Planner [AGPro Series]Continuation Acceptance Planner 🧠 Core Idea Is this continuation setup being accepted, delayed, or invalidated before the next decision point? 📌 Overview / What it does Continuation Acceptance Planner is a chart-first continuation planning tool built to evaluate whether a pullback inside an active trend is producing real acceptance or only temporary hesitation. The script builds a live continuation acceptance band around a trend base, scores the context from 0 to 100, maps the invalidation rail, checks target room against the nearest obstruction, and prints compact state labels such as ACCEPTED, DELAYED, PAUSED, WATCH, and INVALID. It does not predict future price movement, automate entries, or produce guaranteed trade signals. Its role is to organize continuation context into a cleaner decision framework. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who want to judge continuation quality without turning every trend pullback into a signal. Most continuation tools focus on bounce detection or trend strength only. This planner focuses on the decision layer: acceptance quality, pullback risk, target room, invalidation context, and the next action state. The design supports a patient execution mindset. It helps the user ask whether the continuation is actually being accepted, still delayed, temporarily paused, too extended, or losing validity. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on generic trend continuation signals after a moving average touch or pullback bounce. This script does NOT act as a simple buy/sell continuation indicator, and it does not clone a broad trend-continuation quality scanner. Instead, it treats continuation as a planning problem: price must interact with an acceptance band, show a quality close, maintain enough room before obstruction, and stay above or below a clear invalidation rail. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script identifies bullish or bearish continuation context using fast, base, and slow EMA alignment plus trend slope. 2. Reference Mapping It creates a continuation acceptance band around the base EMA and maps the invalidation rail using the band edge, slow EMA, and ATR buffer. 3. Reaction Evaluation It evaluates pullback depth, close acceptance, volume support, and whether price is delaying, accepting, extending, or moving toward invalidation. 4. Visual Output The script displays a centered acceptance-band label, invalidation and target guides, compact state labels, and a premium AG Pro planning panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the live continuation acceptance band around the trend base. Labels = accepted, delayed, invalidation, or watch-state markers with optional 0-100 score. Colors = bullish continuation context uses teal, bearish continuation context uses pink, delayed context uses amber, and risk or invalidation context uses red. Panel = a compact decision dashboard showing Continuation Score, Acceptance, Pullback Risk, Target Room, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • ACCEPTED → continuation context has a qualified acceptance close and enough score to review. • DELAYED → price is interacting with the acceptance band but has not produced enough clean acceptance. • PAUSED → the prior continuation side still matters, but the trend stack needs to rebuild before the setup becomes clean again. • WATCH → continuation context exists, but the setup still needs clearer reaction. • EXTENDED → price is away from the acceptance band and may be late for clean continuation planning. • INVALID RISK → price is moving beyond the planner's invalidation rail. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when continuation acceptance, delayed acceptance, invalidation risk, or blocked target room conditions appear. Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions and should be interpreted with the broader chart context. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest continuation context appears when trend alignment, controlled pullback depth, close acceptance, volume support, and clean target room align. When these components align, the continuation score improves and the panel moves toward a clearer planning state. 📊 When to Use • Primary timeframe: 1H • Secondary timeframe: 4H • Trending markets with structured pullbacks • Continuation setups after a controlled pause • Pullbacks into a moving trend base • Situations where target room and invalidation clarity matter ⚠️ When NOT to Use • When expecting dense signals on 1D or 1W charts • Very low liquidity environments • Extremely noisy sideways conditions • High-volatility shock moves where trend anchors distort quickly • Markets with no clean trend alignment 🎛️ Key Inputs • Sensitivity → changes how strict the acceptance engine is. • Target Obstruction Lookback → defines the prior obstruction used for target-room evaluation. • Acceptance Band Width ATR → controls the width of the continuation band. • Confirmation Mode → defines whether acceptance requires close behavior only, close plus volume, or stricter alignment. • Label and Panel Settings → control visual density, font size, panel location, and theme. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The panel is designed as a compact planning dashboard, not a data-heavy scanner. The first row follows the AG Pro blue merged-header standard. The remaining rows focus only on the information needed for continuation planning: score, acceptance, pullback risk, target room, and action. Chart visuals are intentionally controlled so the acceptance band, invalidation rail, target guide, and labels remain readable. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state. 2. Check whether price is interacting with the acceptance band. 3. Review the continuation score and pullback risk. 4. Compare target room with the invalidation rail. 5. Use labels and alerts as attention markers, not as automatic decisions. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think in terms of setup quality, not prediction. A higher score means the current continuation context has stronger alignment across trend, pullback depth, close behavior, volume, and target room. A delayed state means the idea is not necessarily invalid, but the chart has not yet produced clean acceptance. A paused state means the prior continuation context is still nearby, but alignment weakened enough that patience matters more than chasing. An invalidation-risk state means the continuation structure should be reassessed. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not an auto-trading system • Not a guaranteed signal generator • Not a generic support/resistance or order-block map • Not a gap continuation planner or breakout acceptance planner ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency Timeframe differences can change how continuation bands and target-room references appear. Volatility expansion can move the acceptance band and invalidation rail quickly. Low-volume or synthetic symbols may reduce the usefulness of the volume component. All outputs are rule-based and should be interpreted within broader market context. 🧠 Market Context Notes Continuation planning depends on trend structure, liquidity, volatility, and obstruction distance. The cleanest cases usually appear when pullbacks are controlled, the acceptance close is clear, and the next obstruction is not too close. In the current public-release tuning, the script reads cleanest on 1H charts and remains usable on 4H. Daily and weekly charts can still provide context, but they are less expressive for the intended acceptance-versus-delay workflow. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price pulls back into the acceptance band during a bullish trend and closes back above the base EMA with sufficient target room, the planner may shift toward ACCEPTED. When price stays inside the band without a clean close, the planner may remain DELAYED. When price closes beyond the invalidation rail, the planner flags INVALID RISK. 🧱 System Philosophy The script follows the AGProLabs decision-engine approach: a useful public tool should help traders evaluate validity, strength, risk, target room, and the next action state. It is built to guide interpretation, not to replace trader judgment. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No script can provide certainty. No output from this script guarantees continuation, reversal, profit, or loss avoidance. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own decisions. This script does not provide financial advice and should be used only as an educational and analytical tool. 📚 Educational Note Use the planner to study how continuation acceptance develops across different symbols, sessions, volatility regimes, and timeframes.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Structure Retest Planner [AGPro Series]Structure Retest Planner 🧠 Core Idea Is the active structure retest being accepted, rejected, or invalidated? 📌 Overview / What it does Structure Retest Planner is a structure-based trade planning overlay designed to help traders evaluate how price behaves when it returns to an important swing-derived structure rail. The script maps the active support-side or resistance-side rail, draws a focused retest box around that rail, scores the retest from 0-100, and projects practical invalidation and target guides. The goal is to organize the retest decision process: structure state, score, acceptance, invalidation, and next action. It does not predict the next move, does not automate trading, and does not turn every swing point into a generic support/resistance signal. It is a decision-support planner for reading acceptance and rejection around a live structure retest. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who use price structure but need a cleaner way to judge whether a retest deserves attention. Most structure tools identify levels, breaks, or swing labels. Structure Retest Planner focuses on the next decision after a rail is present: is price responding cleanly enough, is invalidation nearby, and what should be reviewed next? The design supports a planning mindset rather than a signal-chasing mindset. It is meant to make the chart easier to interpret while keeping the trader responsible for context and risk. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on plotting structure breaks, BOS / CHoCH labels, or broad support and resistance zones. This script does NOT clone a BOS / CHoCH detector and does NOT duplicate a first-break retest grader. Instead, it treats the active structure rail as a planning reference and evaluates acceptance, rejection, volatility fit, trend agreement, invalidation distance, and next-action state in one workflow. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script confirms swing-derived structure rails using pivot logic and identifies whether the active planning side is support retest, resistance retest, or automatic nearest-rail context. 2. Reference Mapping It draws a retest box around the active rail, plus an invalidation shelf and target guide. These are planning references, not guaranteed outcomes. 3. Reaction Evaluation The 0-100 score combines level origin quality, retest response, close location, volatility fit, and trend agreement. 4. Visual Output The script shows a centered retest-box label, compact event labels, rail/invalidation/target guides, alerts, and a premium AG Pro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the active retest box around the selected structure rail. Labels = watch, accepted, rejected, invalidated, or risk-review states with optional score and grade. Colors = teal for support-side acceptance, pink for resistance-side or rejection pressure, yellow for review states, and indigo for planning context. Panel = structure state, retest score, acceptance state, invalidation shelf, and next action. 🚦 Signals & States • Retest Watch → price is close enough to the active rail and the score is improving. • Accepted → price tested the rail and closed constructively on the expected side. • Ready → acceptance is active and the score reached the ready threshold. • Rejected → price tested the rail but did not show clean acceptance. • Invalidated → price closed beyond the invalidation shelf. • Risk Review → retest behavior exists, but volatility is too hot for clean reading. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when the script detects a new watch state, accepted retest, high-quality retest review, rejected retest, or invalidation shelf break. Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions and should always be interpreted with broader market context. 🧩 Confluence Logic The score improves when the active rail has a cleaner structural origin, price reacts near the rail, the close lands on the expected side, volatility is not overheated, and trend context agrees with the retest side. When these factors align, the retest context becomes easier to review. When they conflict, the panel shifts toward waiting, context confirmation, risk review, or reset. 📊 When to Use • Pullbacks toward confirmed swing structure • Trend continuation retests • Resistance retests after bearish structure pressure • Support retests after bullish structure pressure • Markets where structure rails are visible and not excessively noisy ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Very low-liquidity symbols • Extremely noisy sideways markets • News-driven volatility spikes • Markets where pivot structure is too compressed to provide useful rails • Any situation where the user expects automated entry or exit instructions 🎛️ Key Inputs • Retest Side → selects Auto, Support Retest, or Resistance Retest. • Structure Pivot Length → controls how structure rails are confirmed. • Sensitivity → changes retest-box width and activation behavior. • Retest Ready Score → sets the minimum score for stronger review states. • Invalidation Shelf ATR → adjusts the planning invalidation reference. • Target Guide R Multiple → projects the forward target guide from planning risk. • Label and Panel Font Size → controls visual readability. • Panel Location and Theme → adjusts interface placement and style. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The panel is built as a compact planning dashboard with one merged blue AG Pro header row and five decision rows. The chart visuals are intentionally restrained: one active retest box, centered box text, structure rail, invalidation shelf, target guide, and controlled labels. The design goal is to make the active retest decision readable without turning the chart into a dense support/resistance map. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel to identify the active structure state. 2. Check whether price is approaching or testing the retest box. 3. Review the retest score and acceptance state. 4. Compare the invalidation shelf and target guide. 5. Use your own broader context before making any decision. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A higher score means the retest is cleaner within the script's rule set. It does not mean price must continue. Acceptance means the bar closed constructively relative to the rail. Rejection means the rail is not holding cleanly. Invalidation means the planning reference has been crossed and the setup should be reviewed again. Use the script to organize thinking, not to outsource judgment. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not auto trading • Not guaranteed signals • Not a BOS / CHoCH auto detector • Not a generic support/resistance zone map ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency The script uses pivot-based structure, so rails appear only after pivots are confirmed. Timeframe choice, volatility, liquidity, and symbol behavior can materially change how retests appear. Fast markets may pass through a rail before the retest can be evaluated cleanly. Sideways markets may create repeated low-quality tests. 🧠 Market Context Notes Structure retests are easier to interpret when liquidity, trend context, and volatility are aligned. A clean rail is not enough on its own. The reaction, close location, invalidation distance, and broader environment all matter. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price returns to a prior support rail and closes back above it with a strong lower wick, the planner may shift from watch to accepted if the score is high enough. When price tests resistance but closes back below the rail with volatility under control, the planner may mark a cleaner resistance-side review state. When price closes beyond the invalidation shelf, the planner marks the context as invalidated and the plan should be reset. 🧱 System Philosophy Structure Retest Planner is part of the AGPro Series decision-engine direction: tools should help traders answer what is valid, how strong it is, where risk is, and what should be reviewed next. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No signal from this script guarantees continuation, reversal, or profit. The output is a structured analytical read, not certainty. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions. This script does not provide financial advice and does not guarantee trading outcomes. 📚 Educational Note Use the planner to study how structure retests behave across symbols and timeframes, especially how acceptance, rejection, volatility, and invalidation interact.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Swing Retest Quality [AGPro Series]Swing Retest Quality 🧠 Core Idea Is the active swing retest clean enough to treat as valid context, or is the pullback too weak, too deep, or too hard to plan? 📌 Overview / What it does Swing Retest Quality is a chart-first swing retest planner built to evaluate pullbacks into an active swing leg. The script maps a focused swing retest pocket, defense line, target-room zone, compact labels, deterministic alerts, and a clean AGPro panel. It converts swing clarity, retest depth, wick rejection, close response, and volume support into a 0-100 Retest Quality score. It does not predict future price movement, automate entries, print buy/sell commands, or replace broader market context. Its purpose is to help traders judge whether a swing retest has enough structure to deserve attention. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who evaluate pullbacks, retests, and continuation structure but want a more disciplined way to judge retest quality. Many tools show structure levels or retest markers without answering the practical planning question: is this retest clean, defended, and readable enough to review? The design philosophy is simple: a retest is not useful just because price touches a level. It becomes useful when the swing reference is clear, the pullback depth is controlled, the response is readable, and risk/target context can be mapped. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on support/resistance touches, break-and-retest markers, BOS/CHOCH events, or broad supply/demand zones. This script does NOT clone Break-Retest Quality, does not require a structure break first, does not map order blocks, does not create a generic S/R zone map, and does not become a broad swing scanner. Instead, it evaluates one active swing leg and asks whether the pullback into that swing has enough quality to be treated as valid context. The main output is not a trade command. It is a planner state: VALID RETEST, WATCH, DEFENSE REVIEW, LOST, or WAIT. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script detects confirmed swing highs and lows, then identifies the active bull or bear swing leg. 2. Reference Mapping It builds a concept-native retest pocket inside the active swing, adds a defense line behind the swing origin, and projects a target-room zone toward the swing terminal. 3. Reaction Evaluation The model scores swing clarity, retest depth, wick rejection, close response, and optional volume support. 4. Visual Output The result is displayed through a centered retest pocket, centered target-room zone, defense guide, swing leg, compact labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the retest pocket shows where a pullback into the active swing leg is being evaluated. The target-room zone shows the available room back toward the swing terminal or extension guide. Labels = compact event labels mark pocket tests, hold retests, watch states, room reviews, and defense-loss events. Colors = teal marks cleaner bull-side retest context, pink marks bear-side or lost-defense context, amber marks caution/review, and indigo marks watch/transition context. Panel = the panel summarizes Retest Quality, Swing Side, Defense State, Risk Room, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • VALID RETEST → the active swing retest is holding with enough quality and room for review. • WATCH → the retest context is improving, but confirmation is incomplete. • DEFENSE REVIEW → price has tested the pocket, but quality, response, or room is not strong enough. • LOST → price has crossed the defense line and the swing context should be rebuilt. • WAIT → no active swing retest context is strong enough yet. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when price touches the swing retest pocket, when a valid swing retest appears, when a watch state appears, when target room becomes limited, and when the defense line is lost. These alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions, entry signals, or automated strategy commands. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest context appears when a clear swing leg is followed by a controlled retest depth, visible wick rejection, a constructive close response, supportive relative volume, and enough target room relative to the defense line. When these components align, the Retest Quality score improves and the state can move from WATCH to VALID RETEST. 📊 When to Use • During pullbacks inside a clear directional swing • When price is retesting a prior swing leg rather than breaking a new structure level • When planning continuation context around a readable defense line • When comparing whether a pullback is clean enough to monitor or too weak to trust • On liquid symbols where pivots, candles, and volume behavior are readable ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Very low-liquidity symbols with irregular candles • Extremely noisy micro-timeframes • News-driven spikes where swing structure becomes distorted • Markets where volume is unreliable and should not affect scoring • Situations where the user expects a signal-only entry tool 🎛️ Key Inputs • Swing Pivot Length → controls how confirmed swing highs and lows are detected. • Max Swing Age → controls how long a swing leg remains active. • Shallow / Deep Pocket Depth → controls the retest pocket inside the swing leg. • Ideal Retest Depth → defines the preferred pullback depth for stronger scoring. • Defense Buffer ATR → controls the defense line behind the swing origin. • Minimum Target Room ATR → defines how much room is preferred before VALID state. • Label and Panel Font Size → controls chart labels, centered zone text, and panel readability. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is designed to stay chart-first. The retest pocket gives the main visual story. The defense line defines where the swing context becomes weak. The target-room zone shows whether the pullback still has practical room to evaluate. The AGPro panel uses a merged blue title row and a compact decision hierarchy so the user can read state, quality, risk, and next action quickly. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state and Retest Quality score. 2. Check whether price has touched the swing retest pocket. 3. Review the defense line and target-room zone. 4. Evaluate whether the label says HOLD, WATCH, ROOM REVIEW, or DEFENSE LOST. 5. Compare the retest with broader trend, liquidity, volatility, and timeframe context. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think in terms of retest quality, not prediction. A stronger score means multiple structural conditions are aligned. A weaker score means the swing may be unclear, the pullback may be too shallow or too deep, the response may be weak, or target room may be limited. The script helps organize the review process. It does not decide for the user. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not an auto-trading system • Not a guaranteed signal tool • Not a Break-Retest Quality clone • Not a BOS/CHOCH scanner • Not a generic support/resistance zone map • Not a supply/demand, order block, or FVG map ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency • Pivot-based swing references depend on the selected Swing Pivot Length. • Scores can vary across symbols, sessions, and timeframes. • Volume support depends on exchange-provided volume data. • Fast, news-driven movement can distort retest depth and defense readings. • In Live Updating mode, active-bar values can change before the bar closes. 🧠 Market Context Notes Swing retests are most useful when the broader chart has readable structure. Liquidity, volatility, trend maturity, and higher-timeframe context can all affect whether a retest should be treated as meaningful. The script provides a structured review layer, not a complete trading system. 🧾 Use Case Examples When a bull swing is clear and price pulls back into the retest pocket, a HOLD RETEST label with a strong score indicates that the pullback response is clean enough to review. When price touches the pocket but target room is too limited, ROOM REVIEW highlights that the structure may be readable but planning space is constrained. When price crosses the defense line, DEFENSE LOST indicates that the active swing context should be rebuilt. 🧱 System Philosophy Swing Retest Quality follows the AGPro decision-engine approach: map the context, score the quality, show the risk reference, show the target room, and summarize the next action without issuing trade commands. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No indicator can provide certainty. The script does not guarantee that a retest will hold, continue, reverse, or produce any specific outcome. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and trading decisions. This script is provided for educational and analytical purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use the script as a structured retest-review framework. The best results come from combining the panel, zones, labels, and alerts with broader chart context and disciplined risk evaluation.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Reaction Follow-Through Planner [AGPro Series]Reaction Follow-Through Planner 🧠 Core Idea Did the first reaction actually create follow-through, or did price only bounce and fade? 📌 Overview / What it does Reaction Follow-Through Planner is a decision-oriented overlay that evaluates what happens after price produces an initial reaction around a confirmed swing reference. Instead of only marking the reaction itself, the script opens a structured follow-through window, measures progress, tracks defense of the reaction zone, defines invalidation, estimates target room, and converts the context into a 0-100 planner score. It produces reaction zones, follow-through tracks, continuation markers, failed-reaction labels, risk/target guide lines, and a compact AGPro panel. It does not predict future price, place trades, automate execution, or claim that any reaction must continue. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who already understand that a reaction candle is not enough. Many charts show a wick, bounce, rejection, hold, or local response, but the real question comes after that first response: did the market follow through with clean progress, participation, and defended invalidation? The design philosophy is simple: treat reaction analysis as a planning workflow. The script helps organize the reaction into strength, follow-through, invalidation, room, and next action. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most reaction tools focus on finding the reaction candle, drawing the level, or scoring the first response. This script does NOT clone a rejection-block detector, a support/resistance reaction map, or a generic pivot reaction score. Instead, it starts after the first reaction appears. It tracks whether that reaction can defend its zone, produce directional progress, maintain follow-through, and offer enough room before the context becomes stale or failed. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The engine tracks confirmed swing reaction references and waits for price to interact with them. 2. Reference Mapping When the first response is accepted, the script builds a reaction zone from the first response candle and defines an invalidation edge beyond the defended area. 3. Reaction Evaluation The script grades the initial reaction candle using close defense, wick defense, body participation, and direction agreement. 4. Follow-Through Tracking During the tracking window, the model measures best directional progress, next-bar response, volume support, adverse excursion, time decay, and whether the invalidation edge remains defended. 5. Visual Output The chart displays reaction zones, follow-through tracks, target room, invalidation guides, continuation markers, failed-reaction labels, and a clean AGPro planner panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the defended first-reaction area that should remain intact for the follow-through case to stay valid. Follow-through track = the movement path from the reaction close toward the current follow-through position. Invalidation guide = the price edge where the reaction context is considered failed by the script logic. Target room guide = the nearby structure or ATR-based room estimate used to judge whether the reaction still has space. Labels = optional reaction start markers, follow-through continuation, or failed-reaction context. Start labels and failed-reaction X markers are disabled by default, while failed-reaction labels use a separate low cap for a cleaner publication view. Colors = teal for bullish reaction continuation, pink for bearish reaction continuation, gold for weak or stalled contexts, and indigo for higher-quality follow-through. Panel = the current reaction strength, follow-through state, invalidation level, room estimate, and next action. 🚦 Signals & States • Bull Reaction Watch → a bullish reaction window is active, but follow-through still needs progress. • Bear Reaction Watch → a bearish reaction window is active, but follow-through still needs progress. • Bull Follow-Through → bullish follow-through reached the planner threshold. • Bear Follow-Through → bearish follow-through reached the planner threshold. • No Follow-Through → the reaction stayed defended but did not generate enough progress inside the tracking window. • Failed Reaction → price closed beyond the reaction invalidation edge. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts are attention markers, not trade instructions. New Bull Reaction Window triggers when a bullish first-response window opens. New Bear Reaction Window triggers when a bearish first-response window opens. Bull Follow-Through Ready triggers when bullish follow-through reaches the score and progress thresholds. Bear Follow-Through Ready triggers when bearish follow-through reaches the score and progress thresholds. Reaction Failed triggers when price closes beyond the active invalidation edge. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest context appears when reaction strength, next-bar progress, volume response, wick defense, and room all align. When the reaction candle is strong but follow-through is weak, the panel will usually remain in watch or no-follow-through mode. When follow-through progresses but invalidation is too close or room is limited, interpretation should stay cautious. 📊 When to Use • After a visible reaction from a swing high or swing low reference. • During retest, hold, rejection, or continuation planning. • When you want to separate first-response reactions from reactions that actually continue. • On symbols and timeframes with enough liquidity for clean candle structure. ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Extremely low-liquidity markets where reaction candles are unreliable. • Very noisy micro timeframes with erratic wicks. • News-driven volatility where invalidation and room can shift quickly. • Situations where the user expects automatic entries or guaranteed outcomes. 🎛️ Key Inputs • Swing Reaction Lookback → controls how selective the reaction references are. • First Response Mode → controls how strict the first reaction filter is. • Follow-Through Track Bars → controls how long the script evaluates continuation after the reaction. • Minimum Planner Score → sets the threshold for continuation-ready context. • Invalidation Buffer → controls how far beyond the reaction zone the invalidation edge sits. • Fallback Target Room → estimates room when no clean opposite structure is nearby. • Visual settings → control zones, optional start labels, outcome labels, failed-reaction label cap, optional failed markers, guides, density, and panel layout. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is built around a clean AGPro panel and chart-first visuals. The panel gives the decision summary. The chart shows the defended reaction zone, follow-through track, invalidation edge, target room, and state labels. The visual hierarchy is intentionally restrained: enough labels to make the chart alive, but not so many that the reaction workflow becomes noisy. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel to see whether a reaction window is active. 2. Check the reaction zone and invalidation edge. 3. Watch whether the follow-through track expands away from the zone. 4. Compare the score with available target room. 5. Treat alerts as review prompts, not execution commands. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A strong reaction is not automatically a strong follow-through. A clean follow-through usually needs directional progress, defended invalidation, supportive participation, and enough remaining room. If the panel says No Follow-Through, the reaction may still be interesting visually, but the script did not detect enough post-reaction continuation quality. If the panel says Failed Reaction, the original reaction context is no longer valid according to the script rules. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine. • Not financial advice. • Not auto trading. • Not guaranteed signals. • Not a replacement for risk management. • Not a generic support/resistance map. • Not a rejection-block scanner. ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency The script is rule-based and depends on confirmed swing references, ATR normalization, volume baselines, and selected sensitivity settings. Different timeframes can produce different reaction windows. High volatility can expand invalidation distance and reduce room quality. Low-liquidity markets can create misleading wick behavior. 🧠 Market Context Notes Reaction follow-through is strongest when the first response is supported by participation and clean progress away from the defended zone. It is weaker when price reacts but stalls near the zone, repeatedly revisits invalidation, or lacks target room. The script is designed to help traders think in terms of reaction quality, not certainty. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price reacts from a swing low and the next bars defend the reaction zone with rising progress, the planner may shift from Bull Reaction Watch to Bull Follow-Through. When price rejects a swing high but immediately reclaims the invalidation edge, the planner may mark Failed Reaction. When price bounces but fails to expand before the tracking window expires, the panel may show No Follow-Through. 🧱 System Philosophy The AGPro approach favors decision engines over simple signal indicators. This script follows that philosophy by turning a reaction into a structured review process: strength, follow-through, invalidation, room, and action. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No score guarantees continuation. No alert confirms a profitable outcome. No visual state should be treated as certainty. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own decisions, risk management, position sizing, and market interpretation. This script is for educational and analytical purposes only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use this script to study how reactions behave after the first response. The goal is to improve interpretation discipline, not to replace a complete trading plan.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Gap Continuation Planner [AGPro Series]TITLE Gap Continuation Planner 🧠 Core Idea Is the active gap being accepted for continuation, or is it losing the structure needed for a clean plan? 📌 Overview / What it does Gap Continuation Planner is a chart-first gap planning tool built to evaluate what happens after a gap appears. Instead of treating every gap as an automatic fill candidate, it asks whether price is accepting the gap edge, following through away from the gap, and preserving a measurable defense line. The script produces a gap defense zone, a continuation corridor, an acceptance edge, a defense line, a target guide, compact labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro decision panel. The panel converts the live context into a 0-100 continuation score, fill-risk reading, and next-action state. It does not predict future price, automate trades, or tell the user to buy or sell. It organizes observable gap behavior into a more disciplined continuation-planning framework. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who do not want to reduce every gap to a simple fill-or-fade idea. Many gaps initially look strong, but the important question is whether the market continues to accept the gap after the first reaction. Gap Continuation Planner focuses on that middle layer: gap acceptance, follow-through, volatility load, defense quality, fill pressure, and forward room. The design supports a planner mindset. The goal is to slow the decision process down and review whether the structure is valid enough to deserve attention. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most gap tools focus on gap detection, gap fill percentage, or historical gap zones. This script does NOT work as a generic gap-fill reaction tool, support/resistance map, imbalance catalog, or automatic signal generator. Instead, it treats the latest gap as a continuation planning object. The model studies whether price is accepting the continuation side of the gap, whether follow-through is developing, whether the defense line remains intact, whether fill risk is rising, and whether there is enough forward room for the plan to remain clean. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script detects classic opening gaps, wick gaps, body-separation gaps, and controlled continuation launch windows when adaptive mode is enabled. 2. Reference Mapping Each accepted gap creates a gap defense zone, an acceptance edge, a defense line, and a target guide. 3. Reaction Evaluation The engine scores gap size, open acceptance, follow-through, volatility load, fill risk, and forward room. 4. Visual Output The chart displays a centered gap-zone label, a centered continuation-corridor label, event labels, planner lines, and a compact AGPro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the detected gap defense area. Continuation corridor = the forward planning area between the accepted gap edge and target guide. Acceptance edge = the side of the gap that price should hold for continuation structure to remain stronger. Defense line = an ATR-buffered invalidation reference beyond the far side of the gap. Labels = state changes such as new gap, acceptance watch, continuation ready, defense review, or failed acceptance. Colors = bullish continuation context uses teal, bearish continuation context uses pink, watch states use indigo, and caution states use amber. Panel = summarizes gap state, continuation score, defense line, fill risk, and next action. 🚦 Signals & States • New Gap → a fresh gap continuation window has been detected. • Acceptance Watch → price is holding the continuation side of the gap, but follow-through still needs confirmation. • Continuation Ready → the gap has stronger acceptance, follow-through, room, and risk structure. • Defense Test → price is retesting the gap edge or defense area. • Fill Risk → the gap is being penetrated enough to reduce continuation quality. • Gap Failed → the active gap has lost continuation acceptance. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when a new gap continuation window appears, when the gap reaches READY state, when acceptance watch begins, when defense review becomes relevant, or when gap acceptance is lost. Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions and do not guarantee that continuation will occur. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest continuation context appears when gap size, gap-edge acceptance, follow-through distance, stable volatility, low fill pressure, and enough forward room align. When these elements align, the continuation score improves. When fill pressure rises or volatility becomes too hot, the score weakens. 📊 When to Use • After opening gaps in stocks, indices, futures, or session-based markets • During continuation attempts after a strong gap • When reviewing whether a gap is holding acceptance or losing structure • Around breakout continuation sessions where risk and target references need to be visible ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Extremely low-liquidity markets • Very noisy or overlapping session opens • News-driven gaps with unstable spreads • Markets where volume and session structure behave unusually • Environments where price is already far beyond a reasonable risk reference 🎛️ Key Inputs • Sensitivity → adjusts how strict the gap and score requirements are. • Gap Mode → controls whether the script reads classic gaps only or adaptive continuation windows. • Acceptance Bars → changes how many bars must hold the continuation side of the gap. • Follow-Through ATR → controls the preferred travel away from the gap edge. • Defense Buffer → sets the ATR spacing for the defense line. • Forward Room Lookback → helps estimate whether nearby structure limits continuation room. • Minimum Continuation Score → sets the READY threshold. • Visual settings → control zones, corridors, lines, labels, object limits, and panel appearance. • Show Failed / Stale Objects → controls whether old failed corridors remain visible. It is disabled by default for a cleaner publication view. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is built for quick planner-style review. The chart carries the structural map, while the panel provides the decision summary. The first panel row follows the AGPro merged blue header standard. The remaining rows focus only on the practical planning fields: state, score, defense, fill risk, and action. The visual hierarchy is intentionally restrained so the gap, corridor, and labels are readable without turning the chart into a crowded signal map. By default, failed or stale gap objects are hidden after they lose live planning value. Event labels remain available so the chart keeps context without carrying too many old failed boxes. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state and continuation score. 2. Check whether price is holding the gap acceptance edge. 3. Review the continuation corridor and target guide. 4. Compare fill risk against the defense line. 5. Use alerts as review markers, not execution commands. 6. Confirm the context with broader market structure, liquidity, and personal risk rules. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A high continuation score means the active gap has stronger structure inside this model. It does not mean the move must continue. Low fill risk supports continuation structure. Rising fill risk means price is starting to challenge the gap. The defense line is a planning reference. It is not a guaranteed stop level and should not replace the user's own risk process. Continuation corridors are visual planning areas, not promised target zones. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT This script is not a prediction engine. This script is not financial advice. This script is not an auto-trading system. This script does not provide guaranteed signals. This script does not replace independent confirmation, risk management, or execution discipline. ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency Gap behavior varies heavily across asset classes, sessions, and timeframes. Adaptive launch windows can help continuous markets, but they should still be interpreted as structured gap-like planning areas rather than classic exchange-session gaps. High volatility can make defense and target references wider. Low liquidity can distort gap quality, label timing, and fill-risk readings. No rule-based script can fully account for news, slippage, spread changes, or sudden liquidity shifts. 🧠 Market Context Notes Gap continuation is often more meaningful when it aligns with trend pressure, session participation, volatility structure, and clean forward room. A gap is not important simply because it exists. It becomes more useful when price accepts one side of it and maintains a measurable defense structure. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price gaps up, holds above the gap edge, and the continuation score improves, the script can help review whether the gap is being defended. When price gaps down and repeatedly rejects back below the gap edge, the panel can help evaluate bearish continuation structure. When fill risk rises quickly, the script highlights that the gap may be losing acceptance rather than continuing cleanly. 🧱 System Philosophy AGProLabs tools are built around structured interpretation. The goal is not to add more signals to the chart. The goal is to turn market behavior into a cleaner review process. Gap Continuation Planner follows that approach by converting a raw gap into a measurable planning object. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No indicator can remove uncertainty. No score can guarantee continuation. No planner can replace the trader's responsibility to manage risk. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. This script is provided for educational and analytical use only. It does not provide financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or guaranteed outcomes. Users remain responsible for their own decisions, risk management, position sizing, and execution. 📚 Educational Note The strongest use of this tool is to study whether a gap is being accepted or rejected as structure develops. It is designed to support review, patience, and disciplined interpretation.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Breakout Failure Recovery [AGPro Series]Breakout Failure Recovery 🧠 Core Idea After a failed breakout, is price recovering through the reclaim level or confirming the failure? 📌 Overview / What it does Breakout Failure Recovery is a chart-first failed-breakout lifecycle planner built to evaluate what happens after price probes outside a recent range and closes back inside. The script maps a failure box, reclaim trigger, risk shelf, recovery/rejection labels, and a compact AGPro panel. It converts close-back-inside behavior, reclaim speed, retest response, volume behavior, and time decay into a 0-100 Recovery Score with a clear next-action state. It does not predict the next move, automate execution, or act as a generic failed-break signal. Its purpose is to organize the post-failure decision context. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who do not want to treat every failed breakout the same way. Some failed breaks recover quickly through the original breakout level. Others reject the boundary, lose time, and confirm that the attempt has failed. This tool focuses on that decision window. The design supports a planner mindset: identify the failure, measure the reclaim attempt, locate the risk shelf, and decide whether the context deserves review or should be downgraded. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools mark a failed break as a single event. This script does NOT stop at the failed-break label, does not clone a Swing Failure Pattern engine, and does not become a generic breakout-failure signal board. Instead, it evaluates the recovery path after the failure. The main output is a recovery state: Recovery Active, Recovery Watch, Failure Confirmed, Reclaim Pending, Window Decaying, or No Active Failure. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script builds a recent range from prior bars and checks whether price probes beyond the upper or lower boundary before closing back inside. 2. Reference Mapping When a failed break appears, it maps the failure box, reclaim trigger, and risk shelf around the failed boundary. 3. Reaction Evaluation The model scores close-back-inside quality, reclaim speed, retest response, volume behavior, and time decay. 4. Visual Output The result is shown through centered failure-box text, a centered risk-shelf label, reclaim/reject labels, alert conditions, and a clean AGPro planning panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Failure Box = the failed-break excursion outside the recent range. Reclaim Trigger = the level that shows the original breakout attempt is trying to recover. Risk Shelf = the boundary zone where retest response should be reviewed. Labels = compact markers for failed break, reclaim, reject, decay, and watch context. Colors = teal highlights constructive recovery context, pink highlights failure or rejection pressure, amber highlights shelf review, and indigo highlights watch states. Panel = summarizes Failure State, Recovery Score, Reclaim Level, Risk Zone, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • Failed Breakout Detected → price probed outside the recent range and closed back inside. • Recovery Watch → recovery conditions are developing, but reclaim confirmation is incomplete. • Recovery Active → reclaim behavior and the Recovery Score have reached stronger review context. • Failure Confirmed → price rejects the failed boundary or moves deeper back into the range. • Reclaim Pending → an active failure exists, but recovery conditions are not strong enough yet. • Window Decaying → the failed-break context is getting old and should carry less weight. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when a failed breakout is detected, when Recovery Watch appears, when Recovery Active appears, or when Failure Confirmed appears. Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions, entry commands, exit commands, or automated strategy rules. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest recovery context appears when price closes back inside the range, reclaims the failed boundary quickly, shows a constructive retest response, receives supportive volume, and does not lose too much time after the failed break. When these components weaken, the script can shift toward Reclaim Pending, Window Decaying, or Failure Confirmed. 📊 When to Use • After a breakout attempt closes back inside a recent range • During range-bound markets with frequent boundary tests • Around failed expansion attempts where reclaim quality matters • When deciding whether a failed breakout deserves continued monitoring • On liquid symbols where range, volume, and candle behavior are readable ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Very low-liquidity symbols with unstable candles • Extremely noisy micro-timeframes • News-driven spikes where levels lose structure quickly • Markets with unreliable volume data • Situations where the user expects a direct signal-only tool 🎛️ Key Inputs • Failure Range Lookback → controls the recent range used to detect failed breaks. • Failure Probe ATR → defines how far price must probe beyond the range boundary. • Recovery Window Bars → controls how long the failed-break recovery window stays relevant. • Retest / Shelf ATR → controls risk shelf thickness and boundary response tolerance. • Recovery Active Threshold → sets the minimum score for the strongest recovery state. • Label and Panel Font Size → controls chart labels, centered zone text, and panel readability. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is designed to stay chart-first. The failure box gives the visual story. The reclaim trigger and risk shelf define the practical review frame. Labels remain compact and controlled so the chart stays active without becoming crowded. The AGPro panel uses a merged blue title row and a compact decision layout for fast reading. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state and Recovery Score. 2. Check the failure box and failed boundary. 3. Compare price behavior against the reclaim trigger. 4. Review the risk shelf and rejection response. 5. Treat alerts as attention markers, then evaluate broader market context. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think in terms of failed-break lifecycle, not prediction. A stronger Recovery Score means the failed breakout is attempting to reclaim quickly with better response and participation. A weaker score means the failure may be aging, rejecting, or losing structural quality. Failure Confirmed does not mean the market must continue in one direction. It means the failed-break attempt is not recovering cleanly within the current rule set. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not auto trading • Not guaranteed signals • Not a generic failed-break signal • Not a Swing Failure Pattern clone ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency The script is rule-based and depends on recent price, volatility, range, volume, and candle behavior. Different timeframes can change how failure and recovery appear. Volatility spikes can temporarily distort boundary behavior. Symbols with unreliable volume may produce weaker participation readings. Outputs should always be interpreted with broader market structure, liquidity, and risk context. 🧠 Market Context Notes Failed breakouts are most useful when the boundary is readable and the follow-up reaction is clear. A quick reclaim can show that the failed attempt is recovering. A weak retest, slow response, or deep move back into the range can show that the failed break is confirming instead. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price probes above a range, closes back inside, then quickly reclaims the upper boundary with supportive volume, the planner may classify the context as Recovery Active. When price probes above a range, closes back inside, retests the boundary from below, and rejects again, the planner may classify the context as Failure Confirmed. 🧱 System Philosophy AGPro planning tools are designed to help traders evaluate context before reacting. This script follows that philosophy by turning failed breakouts into a structured decision question: is the attempt recovering, aging, or confirming failure? 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No indicator can provide certainty. This tool provides structured visual context and rule-based attention markers. It does not guarantee continuation, reversal, recovery, or rejection. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Market conditions can change quickly, and no script can remove uncertainty. Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk management, and decisions. This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use the planner to study how failed breakouts behave after the first rejection, how reclaim speed affects context, and how risk shelves help organize post-failure review.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Range Expansion Risk Planner [AGPro Series]Range Expansion Risk Planner 🧠 Core Idea Does a range expansion offer clean room, or is price moving into immediate failure risk? 📌 Overview / What it does Range Expansion Risk Planner is a chart-first breakout quality and risk-planning tool built for one specific moment: price has left a defined range, and the trader needs to understand whether the expansion has enough structure to deserve attention. Instead of printing generic breakout signals, the script maps the source range, freezes the broken edge, builds an expansion runway, tracks a failure rail, estimates target room, evaluates retest behavior, and converts those conditions into a 0-100 planner score. The script produces a source range box, expansion runway, failed-expansion review band, risk/target rails, full-state labels, deterministic alerts, and a clean AGPro panel. It does not predict future price movement, automate execution, or guarantee that a breakout will continue. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who want to evaluate range expansion quality after price leaves a structure, not simply react to the first candle outside the range. Many tools mark breakouts, draw range boxes, or highlight volatility expansion. The gap is the planning layer after the break: Is the source range mature? Was the expansion candle strong enough? Did price close clearly beyond the edge? Is the retest accepted or weak? Is there enough room before the next target-side reference? The design supports a decision-first workflow. It helps users separate a clean range expansion from a weak release, blocked room, failed expansion, or early unconfirmed movement. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on breakout arrows, range highs/lows, volatility spikes, or support/resistance zones. This script does NOT become a generic range breakout signal, a generic S/R zone map, a squeeze indicator, or a target predictor. Instead, it evaluates the quality of the expansion plan after the range edge is broken. The main output is not a trade command. It is a planning state that helps the user decide whether the current expansion is CLEAN, on REVIEW, waiting for retest, blocked by room risk, or failing back into the source range. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script maps the active source range using a user-defined lookback and detects whether price has closed beyond the upper or lower edge with enough ATR-normalized distance. 2. Reference Mapping When a qualified expansion appears, the script freezes the source range, the broken edge, the failure rail, and the target-room marker so the plan can be reviewed consistently. 3. Reaction Evaluation The model scores range maturity, expansion candle quality, close beyond edge, retest quality, target-room distance, and failure-rail distance. 4. Visual Output The result is displayed through a source range box, expansion runway, failed-expansion band, risk/target rails, full-state event labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the source range shows where the expansion came from. The expansion runway shows the path between the broken edge and the target-room marker. The failed-expansion band shows the area where the release may be losing structure. Labels = full-state markers show Range Expansion, Clean Expansion, Expansion Review, Retest Accepted, Failed Expansion, Target Room Reached, Failure Risk, or Range Watch context. Colors = teal highlights cleaner bullish expansion, pink highlights bearish or failed contexts, amber highlights review/risk states, and indigo highlights watch or target-edge states. Panel = the panel summarizes Range Maturity, Expansion Risk, Room Risk, Confirmation, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • CLEAN EXPANSION → range expansion quality is strong enough to deserve active review. • REVIEW → expansion context is developing, but confirmation or target room is incomplete. • WAIT RETEST → price has expanded, but the broken edge has not yet been accepted clearly. • ROOM BLOCKED → target-side room is limited relative to the current risk structure. • FAILURE RISK → price is back inside the range or close to the failed-expansion area. • FAILED → price crossed the failure rail and the prior expansion plan should be reviewed. • TARGET EDGE → price reached the active target-room marker. • RANGE WATCH → the range is mature enough to monitor, but no qualified expansion is active yet. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when the planner enters clean expansion, review state, retest accepted state, failed-expansion warning, or target-room reached state. These alerts are attention markers only. They are not trade instructions, entry signals, automated strategy commands, or guaranteed outcomes. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest context appears when a mature source range releases with a strong expansion candle, price closes clearly beyond the edge, target-side room remains open, the failure rail is not too far away, and the broken edge receives constructive retest behavior. When those components align, the planner score improves and the action state becomes cleaner. 📊 When to Use • After price leaves a clear range • During breakout-review workflows • When comparing whether a release has enough room to justify attention • When price retests the broken range edge • On liquid symbols where ATR, range, and volume behavior are readable • Especially on 4H swing charts, where range release, retest behavior, failure risk, and target-room context remain visually readable ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Extremely low-liquidity symbols • Very noisy micro-timeframes • News-driven candles that distort the range edge • Markets with frequent gaps or unreliable volume • Situations where the user expects a simple buy/sell signal 🎛️ Key Inputs • Expansion Side → controls Auto, Long Expansion, or Short Expansion planning. • Sensitivity → changes how selective the range maturity and edge-close requirements are. • Source Range Lookback → defines the range used before expansion. • ATR Length → normalizes failure rail, label spacing, expansion distance, and room risk. • Retest Review Bars → controls how long an edge retest can improve confirmation quality. • Target-Side Obstacle Lookback → searches for older target-side references before using the measured target. • CLEAN / REVIEW Scores → adjust how strict the state model is. • Visual settings → control boxes, runway, rails, labels, panel location, theme, and font sizes. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is built around one primary decision path: source range → expansion runway → failure rail → target room. The panel uses the AGPro public-release standard with one merged blue header row containing only the script name. It keeps the decision fields readable without turning the chart into a crowded dashboard. Labels keep full professional state names, are offset away from candles, and are limited by cooldown and max-visible controls. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel action state. 2. Check whether the source range was mature enough before expansion. 3. Review the expansion runway and target-room marker. 4. Check whether price accepted the broken edge or moved back into failure risk. 5. Use alerts as attention markers, then evaluate the broader market context. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A higher score means the model sees better alignment between source range quality, expansion candle quality, edge close, retest behavior, and target room. CLEAN EXPANSION does not mean a trade must be taken. It means the expansion structure is clean enough to deserve active review. REVIEW means the release may be developing, but the user should check confirmation and room quality before treating it as clean. FAILED and FAILURE RISK are caution states. They help identify when an expansion is losing structure after leaving the range. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT This script is not a prediction engine. It is not financial advice. It is not an auto-trading system. It does not provide guaranteed signals. It does not replace user judgment, risk management, or broader market analysis. ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency Timeframe differences can change how range maturity, retests, and target-room references appear. Volatility changes can widen failure rails or reduce clean target room. Fast market conditions can move from CLEAN to FAILED quickly if price returns into the source range. The script is rule-based and should be interpreted as an analytical planning layer, not as certainty. 🧠 Market Context Notes Range expansion quality is not only about breaking the edge. A cleaner expansion usually needs a readable source range, a decisive close beyond the edge, enough room before obstruction, and a failure reference that is not too wide. The planner is most useful when it prevents users from treating every breakout as equal. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price closes beyond a mature range and the target-room marker remains far enough away, the planner may move into REVIEW or CLEAN EXPANSION. When price retests the broken edge and holds outside the range, confirmation can improve. When price closes back through the failure rail, the planner marks FAILED so the old expansion idea is not treated as clean anymore. 🧱 System Philosophy Range Expansion Risk Planner follows the AGPro Series decision-engine approach: Context first. Risk before reaction. Structure before signal. Attention markers instead of promises. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No indicator can remove uncertainty. No score, state, label, alert, range box, runway, or rail should be interpreted as guaranteed market direction. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. All decisions remain the responsibility of the user. This script is for educational and analytical chart review only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use this script to study how range expansions develop, how broken edges behave after release, and how failure risk can be organized visually before making discretionary decisions.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Compression Breakout Readiness [AGPro Series]Compression Breakout Readiness 🧠 Core Idea Is compression mature enough for a breakout watch state, or is the range still early, noisy, or structurally weak? 📌 Overview / What it does Compression Breakout Readiness is a chart-first breakout planning tool designed to evaluate whether a compressed range has developed enough maturity to deserve active attention. Instead of printing a generic breakout signal, the script studies range contraction, ATR compression, pivot tightening, volume dry-up, directional side bias, invalidation-edge distance, and projected breakout room. These components are converted into a 0-100 Readiness Score and a clear next-action state. The script produces an active compression box, breakout watch corridor, invalidation edge, target guide, compact state labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro planning panel. It does not predict direction, automate execution, or guarantee that a breakout will follow through. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who want to evaluate the quality of compression before reacting to a breakout attempt. Many breakout tools only mark the moment price crosses a level. The more useful planning question often comes earlier: is the range actually tight, mature, quiet, and biased enough to watch, or is the structure still too loose? The design supports a decision-first workflow: identify compression, measure readiness, check risk edge, review the watch side, then decide whether the chart deserves attention. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on squeeze dots, breakout arrows, generic consolidation boxes, or simple high/low range breaks. This script does NOT act as a generic squeeze indicator, a choppiness filter, a support/resistance mapper, or a direct buy/sell signal generator. Instead, it evaluates compression maturity before and around the breakout edge. The main output is not a trade command. It is a readiness state that helps the user separate READY WATCH conditions from early, neutral, overheated, or invalidated compression contexts. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script maps the active compression range and evaluates whether current volatility and range width are contracting relative to their baselines. 2. Reference Mapping It builds the compression box, active breakout watch corridor, invalidation edge, and target guide from the current structure. 3. Reaction Evaluation The model scores range contraction, ATR compression, pivot tightening, volume dry-up, side bias, and compression age. It also checks whether the invalidation edge is too tight, too wide, or balanced. 4. Visual Output The result is shown through centered zone text, compact chart labels, clean edge lines, deterministic alerts, and a premium AGPro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Compression Box = the active range being evaluated for breakout readiness. Breakout Watch Corridor = the planning area beyond the active compression edge. Invalidation Edge = the opposite-side reference used to judge risk context. Labels = compact state markers such as READY WATCH, WATCH, EDGE REVIEW, PREMATURE, HOT RISK, and INVALID EDGE. Colors = teal for bullish watch context, pink for bearish or invalid context, amber for caution, and indigo for watch/neutral emphasis. Panel = the panel summarizes Compression Age, Readiness Score, Expansion Side, Risk Edge, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • READY WATCH → compression is mature, biased, and risk edge distance is balanced enough for active review. • WATCH → compression is developing, but at least one readiness component remains incomplete. • EDGE REVIEW → price has moved beyond the compression edge and the user should verify the close and broader context. • PREMATURE → compression has not lasted long enough to build strong maturity. • HOT RISK → volatility has expanded too aggressively for clean readiness interpretation. • NO BIAS → compression exists, but the directional side is not clear enough in Auto mode. • INVALID EDGE → price crossed the active invalidation edge and the prior context may need reset. 🔔 Alerts Logic Alerts trigger when the planner enters READY WATCH, WATCH, EDGE REVIEW, HOT RISK, or INVALID EDGE state. These alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions, entry signals, broker actions, or automated strategy commands. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest readiness state appears when multiple components align: Range contraction + ATR compression + pivot tightening + volume dry-up + directional side bias + balanced risk edge. When those components improve together, the score can rise toward READY WATCH. If volatility becomes too hot, risk becomes distorted, or the active edge fails, the state downgrades. 📊 When to Use • Before evaluating a possible breakout setup • During narrow ranges where volatility is compressing • Around coiling structures that need maturity review • When comparing whether one compression range is cleaner than another • On liquid symbols where range, ATR, and volume behavior are meaningful ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Extremely low-liquidity markets • Highly noisy micro-timeframes • News-driven volatility spikes • Symbols with unreliable or missing volume data • Situations where the user wants a simple breakout arrow or automated trade signal 🎛️ Key Inputs • Breakout Watch Side → selects Auto, Bullish Watch, or Bearish Watch evaluation. • Compression Lookback → defines the active range used for readiness scoring. • ATR Baseline → controls volatility compression comparison. • Volume Dry-Up Length → evaluates whether participation is contracting inside compression. • Minimum Compression Age → controls how mature a range must be before stronger readiness states appear. • READY / WATCH Thresholds → adjust how selective the planner is. • Visual settings → control compression box, breakout corridor, range edges, invalidation edge, projection length, labels, and candle tint. • Panel settings → control panel visibility, location, theme, and font size. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is intentionally chart-first. The compression box uses centered text so the user can read score and age directly inside the structure. The breakout corridor provides a clean forward planning reference without filling the chart with many competing levels. The AGPro panel uses a single merged blue header row and a compact five-row decision layout. Label and panel font sizes are adjustable, with Normal as the default. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel Readiness Score and Action. 2. Check whether the compression box is mature or premature. 3. Review the Expansion Side and breakout watch corridor. 4. Compare the Risk Edge with the visible structure. 5. Treat labels and alerts as review prompts, not trade commands. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A higher score means the script sees stronger compression maturity according to its rule set. READY WATCH does not mean price must break out. It means the compression context is organized enough to deserve attention. WATCH means the structure may be developing but is not fully mature. HOT RISK and INVALID EDGE are caution states. They warn that the range may no longer be clean enough for the same readiness read. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT This script is not a prediction engine. It is not financial advice. It is not an auto-trading system. It does not provide guaranteed signals. It is not a generic squeeze indicator. It is not a choppiness dashboard. It is not a support/resistance scanner. It is not a direct breakout entry tool. ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency Compression quality depends on the selected lookback, timeframe, volatility baseline, and market condition. Volume dry-up may be less reliable on symbols with inconsistent exchange volume. Fast volatility expansion can quickly change the readiness state. Different timeframes can show different compression ranges and side-bias context. The script is rule-based and should be interpreted as an analytical planning layer, not as certainty. 🧠 Market Context Notes Compression by itself is not enough. A useful breakout watch context also needs maturity, reduced noise, a readable side, and a practical invalidation edge. This script keeps those elements visible so users can review breakout readiness before reacting emotionally to a candle crossing a range edge. 🧾 Use Case Examples When a range contracts, ATR falls below baseline, volume dries up, and side bias becomes clear, the planner may move toward WATCH or READY WATCH. When price pushes beyond the edge while readiness is acceptable, the script can mark EDGE REVIEW so the user can verify the close and broader context. When ATR expands too aggressively before structure is mature, the planner can show HOT RISK instead of treating every move as a clean breakout context. 🧱 System Philosophy Compression Breakout Readiness follows the AGPro Series decision-engine approach: Context first. Readiness before reaction. Risk edge before target guide. Attention markers instead of promises. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No script can remove uncertainty. No state, score, label, alert, box, corridor, or line should be interpreted as guaranteed market direction. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. All decisions remain the responsibility of the user. This script is for educational and analytical chart review only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use the script to study how compression matures, weakens, breaks, or invalidates around range edges. The strongest reading comes from combining the panel state with the visible chart structure and broader market context.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Decision Point Planner [AGPro Series]Decision Point Planner 🧠 Core Idea Is price sitting at a decision point that deserves review, patience, or rejection? 📌 Overview / What it does Decision Point Planner is a chart-first risk planning tool built to evaluate whether the current price area is meaningful enough to deserve attention. The script maps one active decision point from structure shelf, balance edge, or trend backbone context, then scores the area using location quality, reaction candle behavior, volume support, trend context, available room, and invalidation distance. The output is a 0-100 Decision Score, a clear next-action state, a decision zone, an invalidation shelf, a target-room corridor, compact labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel. It does not predict price direction, automate execution, or print direct buy/sell signals. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who want to know whether the chart is actually at a meaningful decision area or simply moving through noise. Many tools show levels, zones, or signals in isolation. Decision Point Planner focuses on a narrower planning question: if price is near a decision reference, is the reaction strong enough, is risk still balanced, and is there enough room before the next obstacle? The design supports a patient planning mindset: identify the point, read the reaction, check room and invalidation, then decide what deserves attention. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on plotting many support/resistance levels or marking every reaction. This script does NOT create a generic S/R map, order-block scanner, FVG map, or prediction engine. Instead, it selects one active decision reference and turns it into a planning workflow: Decision Score, Zone Type, Reaction State, Room/Risk, and Next Action. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script detects the active planning side automatically using trend context and range location, or the user can force Long Context or Short Context. 2. Reference Mapping It compares three decision references: the latest structure shelf, the active balance edge, and the trend backbone. The closest relevant reference becomes the active decision point. 3. Reaction Evaluation It evaluates whether price is touching or approaching the zone, whether the candle shows a valid reaction, whether volume supports the reaction, whether trend context agrees, and whether room and invalidation remain balanced. 4. Visual Output It displays a decision zone, invalidation shelf, target-room corridor, compact chart labels, alerts, and a clean AGPro panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Decision Zone = the current area where price is being evaluated as a decision point. Invalidation Shelf = the reference beyond the zone that marks rejection in this rule set. Target-Room Corridor = the available forward room toward the nearest obstacle or a minimum room guide. Labels = compact attention markers showing ACTION, WAIT, PATIENCE, REJECTED, ROOM, or D POINT context. Colors = teal and pink show active directional context, amber shows caution, indigo shows wait/reaction context, and blue is reserved for the AGPro panel header. Panel = summarizes Decision Score, Zone Type, Reaction State, Room Risk, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • ACTION REVIEW → the decision point has enough score, reaction, room, and risk quality to deserve closer review. • WAIT REACTION → price is near the decision point, but the reaction is still incomplete. • PATIENCE → the area is active but quality, room, or risk is not clean enough yet. • REJECTED → price crossed the invalidation shelf for the active decision point. • STAND BY → price is not close enough to the active decision reference. 🔔 Alerts Logic • Decision Point Action Review → triggers when the state enters ACTION REVIEW. • Decision Point Wait Reaction → triggers when price is near the point but reaction is incomplete. • Decision Point Patience → triggers when the active point requires patience or broader confirmation. • Decision Point Room Limited → triggers when the point is active but forward room is limited. • Decision Point Rejected → triggers when price crosses the active invalidation shelf. Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions. 🧩 Confluence Logic Decision quality improves when location, reaction candle behavior, volume support, trend context, target room, and invalidation distance align. The strongest read appears when price is near the decision zone, the reaction candle is efficient, volume is supportive, trend context agrees, room is open, and risk distance is balanced. 📊 When to Use • Around pullbacks where price is near a meaningful planning reference. • During breakout or continuation preparation when the next reaction matters. • Near range edges or balance transitions where patience is required. • When comparing whether a setup deserves review or should remain on watch. • On liquid markets where ATR, volume, and recent structure are meaningful. ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Extremely low-liquidity markets with unreliable volume and candles. • Highly noisy micro-timeframes where decision references change too frequently. • News-driven volatility spikes where ATR and candle ranges expand abnormally. • Charts where the user expects automatic buy/sell signals. • As a standalone reason to enter or exit a trade. 🎛️ Key Inputs • Planning Side → selects Auto, Long Context, or Short Context. • Decision Range Lookback → defines the planning range and target-room obstacle. • Structure Shelf Pivot Length → controls how strict the structure shelf reference is. • Decision Reach ATR → controls how close price must be to the active point before review. • Decision Zone Half-Width ATR → controls the vertical size of the decision zone. • Target Room and Invalidation Inputs → define room quality and balanced risk distance. • Visual Settings → control zones, shelves, corridor, labels, panel location, panel theme, and font sizes. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is intentionally chart-first. The script uses one active decision zone, one invalidation shelf, and one target-room corridor instead of filling the chart with many competing zones. Labels are compact, offset away from candles, and controlled with cooldown and maximum-visible settings. The panel follows the AGPro publication layout with a single merged blue title row, adjustable location, adjustable theme, and adjustable font size. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state and Decision Score. 2. Check the active decision zone and zone type. 3. Evaluate the reaction label and candle behavior. 4. Compare target-room corridor and invalidation shelf. 5. Treat alerts as review markers and confirm the broader market context. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines A higher Decision Score means the active decision point has stronger alignment inside the script's rule set. It does not mean price must move in the planned direction. ACTION REVIEW means the area deserves attention, not automatic execution. WAIT REACTION means the location may be important but the reaction is not complete. REJECTED means the active invalidation shelf was crossed in this rule set. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine. • Not financial advice. • Not auto trading. • Not guaranteed signals. • Not a buy/sell signal service. • Not a generic support/resistance zone map. • Not an order-block or FVG scanner. ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency Decision quality depends on the selected lookback, pivot length, ATR behavior, volume reliability, and timeframe. Different markets can produce different reference behavior. High volatility can widen invalidation distance. Low volatility can compress target room. Small timeframes may produce more frequent state changes. The script is rule-based and should be interpreted as an analytical planning layer inside broader market context. 🧠 Market Context Notes A decision point is useful only when it connects location, reaction, risk, and room. The same visual area can be weak if reaction is poor, volume is absent, target room is blocked, or invalidation is too tight or too wide. This script organizes those checks into one readable decision layer. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price pulls back toward the decision zone and the panel moves from WAIT REACTION to ACTION REVIEW, the area may deserve closer review. When price touches the zone but the panel shows Room Limited, the user can recognize that the nearby path is obstructed. When price crosses the invalidation shelf, the script marks the active decision point as rejected inside its rule set. 🧱 System Philosophy Decision Point Planner follows the AGPro decision-engine approach: Context first. Risk before reaction. Room before confidence. Attention markers instead of promises. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No script can guarantee direction, continuation, reversal, or outcome. This tool provides structured chart context only. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own analysis, risk controls, position sizing, and trading decisions. This script does not provide financial advice, investment advice, or guaranteed trading outcomes. 📚 Educational Note Use the script to study how decision quality changes as price moves closer to or away from active planning references. The most useful reading comes from comparing the panel state with visible price reaction, room, and invalidation context.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Setup Decay Tracker [AGPro Series]Setup Decay Tracker 🧠 Core Idea Is a once-valid setup still healthy, or is its quality decaying over time? 📌 Overview / What it does Setup Decay Tracker is a chart-first execution planning tool built to evaluate what happens after a setup has already started forming. Instead of treating every trigger as equally useful, it separates the process into two stages: setup validation and post-validation quality decay. The script builds an active decay band, validation rail, follow-through rail, invalidation shelf, expiry marker, state labels, and a compact planning panel. Its purpose is to show whether the active setup is still valid, starting to fade, entering decay review, expiring, reclaiming its trigger side, or invalidating. It does not predict price, automate trades, or issue buy/sell commands. Alerts and labels are attention markers designed to help traders review setup quality within broader market context. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who already understand that the first setup trigger is only the beginning of the decision process. A setup can look valid at first, then lose quality because time passes, momentum fades, volatility contracts, follow-through stalls, or price loses and reclaims the trigger side. The gap it fills is post-validation review. Many tools mark a trigger, but fewer tools ask whether that trigger is aging well after it becomes valid. Setup Decay Tracker focuses on that question with a clean visual workflow. The design supports a planning mindset: validate first, monitor quality second, review decay third. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on the moment a signal appears. This script does NOT behave like a generic signal generator, broad regime classifier, support/resistance map, order-block map, or simple breakout alert. Instead, it tracks the lifecycle of one active setup after validation. It asks whether the setup is still earning its place on the chart by measuring time risk, follow-through, momentum loss, volatility loss, trigger-side reclaim behavior, and invalidation context. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script identifies the evaluation side using trend and range context, or the user can force long-side or short-side tracking. 2. Setup Validation A trigger starts tracking, but the setup is not treated as fully valid until it reaches minimum favorable ATR travel and a validation-quality threshold. 3. Decay Evaluation After validation, the script measures the active setup with a 0-100 decay model based on time risk, momentum loss, volatility loss, failed follow-through, and reclaim behavior. 4. Visual Output The result appears as a decay band, validation rail, follow-through rail, invalidation shelf, expiry marker, compact labels, and a premium AGPro planning panel. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Zones = the active setup decay band between the follow-through reference and the invalidation shelf. Labels = state changes such as TRACK, VALID, WATCH, DECAY, RECLAIM, EXPIRED, and INVALID. Colors = teal for healthier states, gold for watch states, pink/red for decay review or invalidation pressure, and indigo for validation or reclaim context. Panel = the decision summary showing Decay Score, Time Risk, Follow-Through, Invalidation, and Action. 🚦 Signals & States • TRACK → a new setup is being monitored for validation • VALID → the setup reached minimum quality and decay tracking is active • STILL VALID → decay score remains low and follow-through is still acceptable • QUALITY WATCH → quality is fading, but the setup has not reached decay review • DECAY REVIEW → the setup has enough quality decay to deserve closer review • RECLAIM → price recovered the trigger side after temporary loss • EXPIRED → the setup aged beyond the active decay window or reached expiry-level decay • INVALID → the invalidation shelf was crossed inside this rule set 🔔 Alerts Logic The script includes alerts for: • New setup tracking • Setup validation • Quality watch state • Decay review state • Trigger-side reclaim • Setup expiry • Setup invalidation Alerts are attention markers. They are not trade instructions and should be interpreted with market structure, liquidity, volatility, and timeframe context. 🧩 Confluence Logic The decay model becomes more meaningful when several conditions align. When time risk rises, follow-through remains weak, momentum fades, volatility contracts, and price struggles around the trigger side, the setup decay context becomes stronger. When follow-through improves, the trigger side holds, volatility remains healthy, and momentum stays directional, the setup remains cleaner. 📊 When to Use • Breakout setups that need post-trigger validation • Trend-reclaim setups where quality can fade after the first reclaim • Continuation contexts where follow-through matters • Active trade planning where invalidation and target references need to stay visible • Markets where setup aging and time risk are part of the decision process ⚠️ When NOT to Use • Extremely low-liquidity symbols • Very noisy micro timeframes where triggers appear too frequently • News-driven candles where normal volatility logic becomes distorted • Markets with large gaps that make ATR-based validation less stable • Situations where the user expects automatic entries, exits, or guaranteed outcomes 🎛️ Key Inputs • Evaluation Side → chooses Auto, Long Setup, or Short Setup tracking • Trigger Model → controls whether tracking starts from range acceptance, trend reclaim, or impulse continuation • Sensitivity → changes how strict validation and decay response should be • Setup Lookback → defines the recent structure window used for trigger context • Validation Travel ATR → sets the minimum favorable movement needed before a setup is considered valid • Decay Tracking Bars → controls how long a validated setup remains active • Follow-Through Target ATR → defines the progress reference used inside the decay model • Invalidation Buffer ATR → builds the invalidation shelf beyond the trigger candle • Label and Panel Font Size → controls visual readability 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The interface is built around a clean chart-first layout. The decay band gives the setup a visible lifecycle area, while the centered band label summarizes the active state without requiring a dashboard-only workflow. The panel is compact and decision-focused. Its first row follows the AGPro standard: one merged blue header row containing only the panel title. Panel location, panel theme, and panel font size are adjustable. Labels are intentionally moderate. The script uses event labels plus sparse context labels so the chart stays alive without becoming crowded. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel and check the active state. 2. Confirm whether the setup is validating, still valid, in watch state, in decay review, expired, or invalidated. 3. Check the decay band, validation rail, follow-through rail, and invalidation shelf. 4. Review labels for the most recent state change. 5. Interpret the output with broader market context before making any decision. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines Think of the Decay Score as a quality-loss meter, not a directional forecast. A low Decay Score suggests that the setup is still holding its validation context. A rising Decay Score suggests that time, weak progress, fading momentum, volatility loss, or trigger-side instability are reducing setup quality. A Decay Review state means the setup deserves attention. It does not mean price must reverse or that a trade must be closed. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not an auto-trading system • Not a guaranteed signal tool • Not a generic support/resistance map • Not a broad market regime classifier ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency ATR-based rails can behave differently across markets, timeframes, and volatility regimes. Fast news moves, thin liquidity, and wide spreads can distort validation and decay readings. No rule-based tool can fully understand every market condition. The output should be read as structured context, not certainty. 🧠 Market Context Notes Setup decay often matters most when the first trigger was valid but follow-through becomes uncertain. A setup can remain technically alive while losing momentum, time efficiency, or volatility support. The script focuses on that middle zone between “still valid” and “clearly invalidated.” 🧾 Use Case Examples When price breaks a recent range, validates with minimum travel, then stalls for many bars without reaching the follow-through rail, the Decay Score can rise into watch or review context. When price temporarily loses the trigger side and then reclaims it, the script marks reclaim context and continues monitoring quality rather than treating the setup as automatically clean. When price crosses the invalidation shelf, the setup is marked invalid inside this rule set. 🧱 System Philosophy Setup Decay Tracker follows the AGPro planning approach: the best public tools should help traders make a decision, not simply show another signal. The script is designed to answer practical questions: Is this setup valid? How much quality has it lost? Where is the invalidation? Is follow-through still acceptable? What should I review now? 🔐 Non-Promise Statement This script does not provide certainty. It does not guarantee outcomes. It provides a structured way to monitor setup quality decay after validation. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own analysis, decisions, risk management, and trade execution. This script is for educational and analytical purposes only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note Use the tool to study how setup quality changes after the first valid trigger. The most useful reading often comes from comparing the panel state, decay band, labels, and broader market context together.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs
Execution Window Planner [AGPro Series]Execution Window Planner 🧠 Core Idea Where is the cleanest active price window for evaluating execution context? 📌 Overview / What it does Execution Window Planner is a chart-first execution-readiness tool built to answer one practical question: is price currently sitting inside a clean review window, or is the context too early, too late, too stretched, or already invalidated? The script maps an active execution window box, a risk edge, a target edge, compact state labels, and a premium AGPro panel. It converts window width, structure alignment, volatility fit, trend support, candle confirmation, and room-to-risk context into a transparent 0-100 Quality Score. It does not predict price movement, automate orders, or issue buy/sell commands. The output is designed as an analytical planning layer for traders who want cleaner context before making their own execution decisions. 🎯 Purpose & Design Philosophy This script was built for traders who already have a directional thesis but need a disciplined way to judge whether the current price area is actually usable for execution review. Many tools show trend, signals, support/resistance, or zones. The missing piece is often the active decision window: the price area where risk is still definable, target room still exists, volatility is not distorted, and confirmation is not too weak. The design philosophy is simple: execution quality should be evaluated through a defined window, not through excitement around a single candle. ⚡ Why This Script Is Different Most tools focus on printing a signal, marking a generic support/resistance area, or showing a large multi-feature trading dashboard. This script does NOT act as a full trading suite, signal service, position sizing tool, ICT/FVG map, order block map, or generic zone scanner. Instead, it keeps one narrow purpose: identify and score the current execution window using risk edge, target edge, structure, volatility, trend support, and candle confirmation. The result is a focused decision layer rather than another broad indicator. ⚙️ Methodology 1. Context Detection The script detects the active planning side automatically from trend structure, or lets the user force a long-bias or short-bias view. 2. Reference Mapping It builds a risk edge from recent structure and a target edge from broader structure or ATR-adjusted room. 3. Window Construction It creates an active execution window around the current trend reference, then limits that window between the risk edge and target edge. 4. Reaction Evaluation It scores window width, structure alignment, volatility fit, trend support, and candle confirmation into a 0-100 Quality Score. 5. Visual Output The chart displays the execution window box, risk/target edges, state labels, alerts, and a premium AGPro panel with the key decision fields. 🗺️ How to Read the Chart Execution Window = the current price area where the script is evaluating execution context. Risk Edge = the structure-based invalidation edge for the active window. Target Edge = the nearest meaningful target-side reference or ATR-adjusted room marker. Labels = the current window state, score tier, risk distance, and room-to-risk context. Colors = teal for stronger bullish execution windows, pink for bearish or invalidation contexts, amber for forming/waiting states, and indigo for target-edge or transition states. Panel = the fastest summary of window state, quality score, risk edge, target edge, and next action. 🚦 Signals & States • ACTIVE → the execution window meets the quality threshold and confirmation filter. • FORMING → the window is improving but still needs cleaner confirmation. • WAIT → the context exists, but structure, volatility, room, or confirmation is not strong enough yet. • BLOCKED → there is no clean execution window in the current context. • TARGET EDGE → price has reached the mapped target-side reference and reaction quality should be evaluated. • INVALIDATED → price closed beyond the active risk edge. 🔔 Alerts Logic ACTIVE Window alerts trigger when the state upgrades into ACTIVE. Downgrade alerts trigger when the active window weakens from a stronger previous state. Risk Edge alerts trigger when price closes beyond the current risk edge. Target Edge alerts trigger when price reaches the current target edge. Alerts are attention markers only. They are not trading instructions. 🧩 Confluence Logic The strongest execution-window context appears when several conditions align: • Price remains inside the mapped execution window • The risk edge is still structurally valid • The target edge leaves enough room relative to risk • Trend support agrees with the active side • Candle structure confirms the same direction • Volatility is close to its recent baseline When these elements align, the Quality Score improves and the panel state becomes easier to interpret. 📊 When to Use • When you already have a directional thesis and want to evaluate execution context • During trend continuation setups where risk and target references remain clear • Around pullback or reset areas where timing and risk quality matter • Before reacting to a potential continuation candle • When you want a cleaner planning layer instead of another simple signal indicator ⚠️ When NOT to Use • During very low-liquidity conditions where candles print irregularly • During high-noise chop where risk and target edges change too quickly • During extreme volatility spikes where ATR context becomes distorted • On symbols with poor price continuity or unreliable session behavior • As a standalone reason to enter or exit a trade 🎛️ Key Inputs • Setup Direction → Auto detects the active planning side, or the user can force Long Bias / Short Bias. • Sensitivity → controls how selective the model is. • Structure Lookback → controls how risk edge, target edge, and structure context are mapped. • Minimum ACTIVE Score → defines the score threshold required for ACTIVE state. • Confirmation Mode → controls how much trend and candle confirmation must align. • Label Cooldown Bars → controls historical label density. • Max Visible Labels → limits older state labels to keep the chart readable. • Label Detail → Compact is the default clean publication view; Balanced and Full can show more risk/room context. • Label Offset Strength / Lane Strength → smart placement controls that keep labels near price without burying them inside candles or pushing them too far away on higher timeframes. • Panel Location / Theme / Font Size → controls the AGPro panel presentation. • Label Font Size → controls all on-chart labels. 🖥️ Interface & Visual Design The panel is designed as a compact decision dashboard, not a large command center. The first row uses the standard AGPro merged blue header row, and the remaining rows focus only on the information needed to evaluate the current execution window. The chart visuals stay restrained: one active execution window, one risk edge, one target edge, a current quality tag, and moderate historical state labels. The goal is a premium, readable chart that does not feel empty but also avoids clutter. 🧪 Practical Usage Workflow 1. Read the panel state first. 2. Check whether price is inside or near the execution window. 3. Compare the risk edge and target edge. 4. Review the Quality Score and confirmation state. 5. Interpret labels as context markers, not as trade commands. 6. Confirm the broader market context with your own process. 🔍 Interpretation Guidelines ACTIVE does not mean guaranteed continuation. It means the current window has passed the script's rule-based quality model. FORMING means the setup may be developing, but the script does not yet see enough confirmation. WAIT means the context may exist, but the window quality is not clean enough. BLOCKED means the current chart does not offer a useful execution window under the selected settings. TARGET EDGE means the chart has reached the mapped target-side reference, so reaction quality becomes more important than chasing the move. INVALIDATED means the risk edge has been broken and the active window should be reset. 🚫 What This Script Is NOT • Not a prediction engine • Not financial advice • Not an auto-trading system • Not a guaranteed signal tool • Not a full trading suite • Not an ICT/FVG or order block map • Not a generic support/resistance zone scanner ⚠️ Limitations & Transparency Execution-window quality is rule-based and depends on the selected inputs, timeframe, symbol behavior, and available chart data. Different timeframes can produce different risk and target edges because market structure changes with resolution. Fast volatility expansion can make the current edge distances less stable. Low-volume markets may produce weaker confirmation quality. The script should be interpreted inside broader market context, not in isolation. 🧠 Market Context Notes Execution quality is usually strongest when structure, volatility, and trend behavior are aligned. If volatility expands too quickly, the window can become stretched even if direction looks strong. If the target edge is too close, the setup may have limited room even when the trend looks clean. If the risk edge is too far away, the setup may require too much tolerance relative to the available room. 🧾 Use Case Examples When price pulls back toward the active trend reference, remains inside the execution window, and the risk edge is still structurally protected, the Quality Score may improve. When price reaches the target edge after an ACTIVE window, the script can shift into TARGET EDGE state so the user can evaluate reaction behavior instead of treating the move as fresh. When price closes beyond the risk edge, the window becomes INVALIDATED and the panel shifts to a reset-oriented state. 🧱 System Philosophy Execution Window Planner follows the AGPro Series approach: build scripts that help traders make a decision, not just see another signal. The script is intentionally narrow. It focuses on one practical question and keeps the chart output centered around that question. 🔐 Non-Promise Statement No script can provide certainty. No score guarantees future movement. No alert should be treated as an instruction to trade. 📉 Risk Disclosure Trading involves risk. Users are responsible for their own analysis, execution choices, risk management, and trading outcomes. This script is for educational and analytical use only and does not provide financial advice. 📚 Educational Note The best use of this script is to study how execution context changes as price moves between risk edge, execution window, and target edge. Use it as a structured planning aid, not as a replacement for your own market analysis.
Chỉ báo Pine Script®
của AGProLabs