Previous idea is incorrect, not in the pattern itself but the size of it, it should be about 1 third bigger i think than the laft side of an almost symmetrical pattern.
I think on the 2 interval between the phases might be giving us a idea of the size3 of the next phase. too early to say for shure until i look back but this is just a minder in many ways to myself to check it out as i am leaving office now and may forget. on phase 2 interval the size difference between the two parts of the interval may well be the same percentage as the difference in size between phase 2 and phase 3.
new discovery. Might work for time calculations and formation sizes.
1.2610 is a starting point it would appear for things
When lookinf at patterns in 3 phases i will want to look at if each phase is 1.261 larger.
For predicting future events using ma we calculation over 13bard, offsett 13, then for second fib dip retrace we 13 bars off set13x2x1.261 +32.786
I think on the 2 interval between the phases might be giving us a idea of the size3 of the next phase. too early to say for shure until i look back but this is just a minder in many ways to myself to check it out as i am leaving office now and may forget. on phase 2 interval the size difference between the two parts of the interval may well be the same percentage as the difference in size between phase 2 and phase 3.
1.2610 is a starting point it would appear for things
When lookinf at patterns in 3 phases i will want to look at if each phase is 1.261 larger.
For predicting future events using ma we calculation over 13bard, offsett 13, then for second fib dip retrace we 13 bars off set13x2x1.261 +32.786
