EOS flat scenario.
In this scenario, I see the bull reaction since December 2018 as a big regular flat.
Guidelines of a regular flat:
• A corrective 3 waves move labeled as ABC
• Subdivision of wave A and B is in 3 waves
• Subdivision of wave C is in 5 waves impulse / diagonal
• Subdivision of wave A and B can be in any corrective 3 waves structure including zigzag, flat, double three, triple three
• Wave B terminates near the start of wave A
• Wave B = 90% of wave A
• Wave C = 61.8%, 100%, or 123.6% of wave AB
We can tick off most of these guidelines.
• Wave A was a perfect WXY but I have to admit that the X fell pretty short of W. However, that can happen sometimes.
• Wave B is a bit difficult to count because I can count this one different but I count it in this scenario as a simple ABC with an ending diagonal. Another thing worth mentioning here is the fact that primary wave B fell short of the 90% fib retracement of primary wave A.
Primary wave C
Now for wave C, as mentioned above, wave C is an impulse that needs to reach the 61.8% fib of wave A. We failed to do that...
The current decline looks to me as a zig-zag down. However, it isn't done yet so this can change during the next couple of hours/days. But if true, there is still a possibility that we can see one last leg higher to $6.28 or even $12.14 to tick of that last guideline.
The only thing we can do is to monitor it very closely...
Guidelines of a regular flat:
• A corrective 3 waves move labeled as ABC
• Subdivision of wave A and B is in 3 waves
• Subdivision of wave C is in 5 waves impulse / diagonal
• Subdivision of wave A and B can be in any corrective 3 waves structure including zigzag, flat, double three, triple three
• Wave B terminates near the start of wave A
• Wave B = 90% of wave A
• Wave C = 61.8%, 100%, or 123.6% of wave AB
We can tick off most of these guidelines.
• Wave A was a perfect WXY but I have to admit that the X fell pretty short of W. However, that can happen sometimes.
• Wave B is a bit difficult to count because I can count this one different but I count it in this scenario as a simple ABC with an ending diagonal. Another thing worth mentioning here is the fact that primary wave B fell short of the 90% fib retracement of primary wave A.
Primary wave C
Now for wave C, as mentioned above, wave C is an impulse that needs to reach the 61.8% fib of wave A. We failed to do that...
The current decline looks to me as a zig-zag down. However, it isn't done yet so this can change during the next couple of hours/days. But if true, there is still a possibility that we can see one last leg higher to $6.28 or even $12.14 to tick of that last guideline.
The only thing we can do is to monitor it very closely...
Thông báo miễn trừ trách nhiệm
Thông tin và ấn phẩm không có nghĩa là và không cấu thành, tài chính, đầu tư, kinh doanh, hoặc các loại lời khuyên hoặc khuyến nghị khác được cung cấp hoặc xác nhận bởi TradingView. Đọc thêm trong Điều khoản sử dụng.