after taking a deeper dive into the nvda waves
i come to a conclusion this morning that my original idea which i projected back in december could indeed be at play for the q's.
![[primary nasdaq outlook].](https://static.tradingview.com/static/images/svg/idea-image-placeholder.svg)
↕
check out the video for a deep dive into the psychology behind the og idea.
↕
www.youtube.com/watch?v=inMuxe_H...
---
now, my only argument against it is the inability to get a clean 5 wave count within the C leg,
due to this particular market only operating 5 days a week, there's no way for me to actually confirm 5 waves in within that chop.
playing devils advocate here, for the sake of keeping the original idea alive, as there was a massive amount of data supporting it,,, it's possible wave c could be some sort of ending diagonal.
---
if the og idea is indeed at play,
we will sweep the 1.75 algo, then fall.
---
b target = 368
c target = 228
i come to a conclusion this morning that my original idea which i projected back in december could indeed be at play for the q's.
![[primary nasdaq outlook].](https://s3.tradingview.com/l/L2gt67O7_big.png)
check out the video for a deep dive into the psychology behind the og idea.
↕
www.youtube.com/watch?v=inMuxe_H...
---
now, my only argument against it is the inability to get a clean 5 wave count within the C leg,
due to this particular market only operating 5 days a week, there's no way for me to actually confirm 5 waves in within that chop.
playing devils advocate here, for the sake of keeping the original idea alive, as there was a massive amount of data supporting it,,, it's possible wave c could be some sort of ending diagonal.
---
if the og idea is indeed at play,
we will sweep the 1.75 algo, then fall.
---
b target = 368
c target = 228
