QQQ's 3rd Pillar

AAPL is the strongest of the 3 generals since price is holding above it's 20d MA with no meaningful breakdowns since mid-October

• Higher highs/higher lows intact
  
• AAPL is the relative strength leader
  
• Pullbacks are still being bought
  
• Upside momentum is slowing, but no bearish triggers
  

MSFT cleanly bounce from oversold, but still a repair phase

• Hit lower Bollinger from the highs in late October
  
• Strong rebound off ~$465
  
• Still below its prior support around $520-$530, so this rally is still “inside the correction”
  
• This is a reaction rally after a near-vertical flush
  
• MSFT is repairing damage, not in breakout mode
  
• It’s the “middle child” right now, stronger than NVDA, weaker than AAPL
  

NVDA is the odd one out (weakest)

• Clear lower highs since the early-November peak
  
• Broke down through $195 & failed to reclaim it convincingly
  
• Trading below its short-term MA
  
• NVDA is objectively the weakest structure, it's trend is broken, momentum pushing down, failed bounce attempts & chart resembles early-stage trend deterioration, not a completed correction
  

All three semis/chips (NVDA) have shown relative weakness lately vs megacap tech (AAPL + MSFT)
This aligns with QQQ given rotation inside tech rather than broad risk-on

• AAPL doesn’t support a bearish tilt (too strong)
  
• MSFT is neutral, but slightly bullish short-term
  
• NVDA supports a bearish tilt (weak structure, momentum down)
  

QQQ weighting is heavily influenced by AAPL + MSFT, which are not breaking down

• These charts do not reinforce a clean bearish thesis
  
• They show rotation (NVDA weakness), but no index-leader breakdown (AAPL/MSFT still intact)
  
• To get a real QQQ rollover, you typically need AAPL + MSFT to crack simultaneously
  

AAPL is the single most important line of defense for QQQ

• Downside risk only becomes serious if AAPL loses trend with critical Levels at $268-$270 (the rising short-term trend support) & the top of the old consolidation from late October
  
• A break would first invalidate momentum, then flip the trend down
  
• If AAPL closes <$268, you’re no longer in “bull flag mode,” but in trend reversal territory & QQQ loses its strongest pillar
  

MSFT is the canary for liquidity since MSFT drives a ton of passive flow

• Its rebound is strong, but it’s a reaction rally inside a broken structure
  
• This is the rebound low & the base of the prior breakdown
  
• Losing this means the bounce was a dead-cat & confirms a larger down-leg
  
• A daily close <$480 signals recovery failed, sellers in control & next level becomes ~$460
  
• That is a meaningful QQQ drag
  

NVDA is already weak

• NVDA is the weakest chart of the 3 generals
  
• It does not have to break down to add downside pressure, but there is a level where selling accelerates sharply, $170-$173, the base of the November flush
  
• A close <$170 opens a vacuum to $160 to $150 fast
  
• That would be a serious volatility event for QQQ
  

Genuine QQQ downside risk appears only when 2 of the 3 megacaps break, so if these 2 things happen, downside risk is confirmed

1. AAPL closes <$268-$270
   
2. MSFT closes <$480-$485
   

At that point, QQQ loses AAPL’s trend support & MSFT’s liquidity bid

• NVDA is already structurally weak, so the combined effect is decisive
  
• Those two breaks together flip the entire index environment from “bullish trend with rotation” to “index-level breakdown”
  

Alphabet (GOOGL) has been the stealth leadership bid

• When AAPL & NVDA wobble, Alphabet often becomes the rotational safety valve inside QQQ because it trends cleanly, absorbs passive flows (huge weighting) & attracts “quality growth” buyers when semis weaken
  
• This stabilizes QQQ even when one of the top names is soft
  

But here’s the nuance

• Alphabet’s strength can support QQQ, but it cannot prevent a QQQ breakdown if AAPL or MSFT crack key levels given weighting reality of AAPL + MSFT = ~23-26% of QQQ
  
• GOOGL (A + C) = ~8-10% total
  
• Alphabet can dampen downside, not cancel it
  

Alphabet’s run-up is a sign of “healthy rotation,” not froth

• Alphabet’s recent behavior looks like trend accelerating, rising volume on up days, oscillators in a bullish regime but not overcooked & clean support at each pullback
  
• This is classic “institutional accumulation”
  
• When markets are topping, you don’t typically see new leadership emergences - you see everything stall
  

Alphabet rising while NVDA weakens suggests this is sector rotation, not index distribution

• It tells you “the market is not in risk-off, but in reshuffle mode"
  
• Alphabet’s strength delays downside - it doesn’t prevent it
  
• NVDA breaking down is a noticeable drag, MSFT breaking $480 is a real drag & AAPL breaking $270 is an index “air pocket” event
  
• Alphabet can counter only 1 of these circumstances, not 2
  
• When the flows in the biggest names turn, Alphabet’s strength becomes irrelevant because passive flows unwind, systematic strategies flip short/flat, correlations compress toward 1 & Alphabet gets sold with the others at that point
  

Alphabet helps explain why QQQ hasn’t rolled over yet

• This is the key practical takeaway
  
• Alphabet’s strength is the reason you’re seeing shallow dips, the reason VIX isn’t reacting much & the reason QQQ keeps getting saved above key levels
  
• It’s functioning as a 3rd pillar, replacing NVDA for now, but again, it cannot offset a structural loss of AAPL or MSFT
  

The combined model (AAPL, MSFT, NVDA, GOOGL)

• If Alphabet stays strong & AAPL/MSFT hold, pullbacks are just noise
  
• If Alphabet stays strong, but MSFT breaks $480, QQQ slides, but not violently
  
• If Alphabet is strong, but AAPL breaks $270, QQQ drops harder than you expect
  
• If Alphabet weakens & either AAPL or MSFT fail, sharp downside becomes likely
  
• Alphabet is a stabilizer, not a shield
  

Alphabet’s run-up tells you institutions are still allocating into megacap tech, the market is rotating, not distributing & QQQ won’t break on NVDA weakness alone
I

• t delays downside risk, but does not erase it
  
• The real triggers remain AAPL <$270 & MSFT <$480
  

QQQ is short-term bullish, but not yet a durable trend reversal

• The 21 November AVWAP has been acting like a dynamic rising support line
  
• Price respected it during every hourly pullback
  
• Friday’s price extended above it into stretched momentum territory which means buyers have controlled the bounce, but this AVWAP is far from price now so mean-reversion risk increases
  
• Both AVWAPs show an extended, overbought bounce with no real test of strength
  

The rally from the 21 November low is steady, one-sided, over-extended, on declining volume, into a major prior supply & without a single higher-volume accumulation candle

• This looks almost exactly like a corrective rally into resistance, not a fresh impulse trend
  

QQQ SPY AAPL GOOGL MSFT NVDA